2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10711-008-9339-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projective background of the infinitesimal rigidity of frameworks

Abstract: We present proofs of two classical theorems. The first one, due to Darboux and Sauer, states that infinitesimal rigidity is a projective invariant; the second one establishes relations (infinitesimal Pogorelov maps) between the infinitesimal motions of a Euclidean framework and of its hyperbolic and spherical images. The arguments use the static formulation of infinitesimal rigidity. The duality between statics and kinematics is established through the principles of virtual work. A geometric approach to static… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Riemannian case these results are contained inside a general statement saying that each times that there is a map from a manifold to a flat manifold sending geodesics to geodesics then there exists a (unique) map of the associated tangent bundles sending Killing fields to Killing fields [Vol74] (this result should be checked for pseudo-Riemannian context). Concerning the polyhedral surfaces, there exists a more geometric way to define the infinitesimal Pogorelov maps [SW07,Izm08].…”
Section: Fuchsian Infinitesimal Rigiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Riemannian case these results are contained inside a general statement saying that each times that there is a map from a manifold to a flat manifold sending geodesics to geodesics then there exists a (unique) map of the associated tangent bundles sending Killing fields to Killing fields [Vol74] (this result should be checked for pseudo-Riemannian context). Concerning the polyhedral surfaces, there exists a more geometric way to define the infinitesimal Pogorelov maps [SW07,Izm08].…”
Section: Fuchsian Infinitesimal Rigiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the Möbius geometry of R 3 ∪ {∞} is a subgeometry of the projective geometry of RP 4 . Möbius transformations of R 3 ∪{∞} are represented as projective transformations of RP 4 preserving the quadric defined by the light cone L. If two non-degenerate realizations are related by a projective transformation, then the spaces of self-stresses of the two realizations are isomorphic [23]. Hence, we obtain another proof of Theorem 1.3.…”
Section: Möbius Invariancementioning
confidence: 85%
“…Then the above corollary is simply a special case of the projective invariance of infinitesimal rigidity [23]. In the smooth theory a minimal surface is the Christoffel dual of its Gauß map.…”
Section: Example: Inscribed Triangular Meshesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The equivalence relations from Definition 3.1 ensure that a linear extension is well-defined. For a proof of its bijectivity, see [24].…”
Section: Equivalence Of Static and Infinitesimal Rigiditymentioning
confidence: 99%