2000
DOI: 10.1002/1520-7560(0000)9999:9999<::aid-dmrr101>3.0.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proliferative responses to selected peptides of IA-2 in identical twins discordant for Type 1 diabetes

Abstract: We conclude that T cell responses to selected IA-2 peptides are not genetically determined, heterogeneous, not strictly HLA controlled and did not distinguish diabetic or prediabetic twins from non-diabetic twins or controls. The identification of an immunodominant T cell response to IA-2 peptide 502-514 raises the possibility that this, or similar, epitopes may be of therapeutic value in disease prevention.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[99][100]. While a number of epitopes from the three main autoantigens have been identified, specific for CD4 + cells from peripheral blood of newly-diagnosed patients, it has not been possible to establish their relative importance in pathogenesis [71][72][73][74][75][101][102][103][104][105]; it is still unresolved, for example, if disease pathogenesis commences with responsiveness to a few primary epitopes, with consequential and orderly epitope spreading, or whether there is a "random hit" mechanism at first, and a generalized breakdown of tolerance to autoantigen epitopes thereafter. This is particularly so for the CD4 epitopes, as they reflect restriction to the HLA-DQ alleles conferring susceptibility to the disease.…”
Section: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitusmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[99][100]. While a number of epitopes from the three main autoantigens have been identified, specific for CD4 + cells from peripheral blood of newly-diagnosed patients, it has not been possible to establish their relative importance in pathogenesis [71][72][73][74][75][101][102][103][104][105]; it is still unresolved, for example, if disease pathogenesis commences with responsiveness to a few primary epitopes, with consequential and orderly epitope spreading, or whether there is a "random hit" mechanism at first, and a generalized breakdown of tolerance to autoantigen epitopes thereafter. This is particularly so for the CD4 epitopes, as they reflect restriction to the HLA-DQ alleles conferring susceptibility to the disease.…”
Section: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitusmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Yet, there have been several counter-examples to this, rendering the generalization a poor one [42,43,70]. Likewise, there have been cases where residues p-1, p-2, even p-4, and p10 appeared significant for T cell recognition [71][72][73][74][75]. As such residues are clearly outside the canonical footprint of the TCR, hence not in contact with it, such effects can have two possible explanations: a. that the presence of these substitutions causes subtle changes in their proximal MHC II and peptide residues that are part of the TCR footprint, affecting thus indirectly such an interaction.…”
Section: The Mhc Ii-peptide-tcr Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation