In Sadagopan 1 , the errors were published on pages 7, 8, and in Table 1. On page 7, Section 3.2, where the article reads: The calculated pK a of 4 was 8.65, while that of the ammonium ion is known to be 9.3. Thus, showing it is favorable for ammonia to displace proline in the structure. An abundance of ammonia in the early atmosphere of Earth, can drive the production of 5. It should read: The calculated pK a of 4 was 8.65, resulting in protonation in aqueous solution. The reason for retention of stereochemistry during aminolysis, is that the resulting species is in equilibrium with proline and 5-cyanoxolan-2-one, with the latter species reacting with ammonia to form 5. These species are favored is because (1) two molecules are being produced from every molecule of 4, (2) equilibrium proline concentration is relatively low because it is reactive with many substrates, and (3) the reactant accumulates in the system. On page 8, first column, where the article reads: Kinetic analysis of the pathways (Table 1) suggests that both arbitrary excesses in S-proline and R-proline will propagate through the cycle because their respective syn-products (si, S and re, R pathways) have a higher rate of production than their respective anti-products (re, S and si, R pathways). It should read: Kinetic analysis of the pathways (Table 1) suggests that both arbitrary excesses in S-proline and R-proline will propagate through the cycle because their respective anti-products (si, S and re, R pathways) have a higher rate of production than their respective syn-products (re, S and si, R pathways). On Table 1, the wrong kinetic model was used for calculations. The results from the transition state theory (TST) model at 338 K are shown below: The author apologizes for this error. a Average temperature on primordial Earth.