1998
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prolongation and optimization of Doppler enhancement with a microbubble US contrast agent by using continuous infusion: preliminary experience.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
8

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
64
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Intravenous injection of an ultrasound contrast agent (USCA) that is not eliminated via the lungs (eg, Levovist) considerably improves the quality of the Doppler signal even if penetration of the temporal bone is poor. [5][6][7][8][9][10] Therefore, it seemed to be logical to perform the TCD-CO 2 test with such an agent. The effect of a single-bolus injection is only of short duration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intravenous injection of an ultrasound contrast agent (USCA) that is not eliminated via the lungs (eg, Levovist) considerably improves the quality of the Doppler signal even if penetration of the temporal bone is poor. [5][6][7][8][9][10] Therefore, it seemed to be logical to perform the TCD-CO 2 test with such an agent. The effect of a single-bolus injection is only of short duration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved through a continuous injection with an infusion pump. 6,12 However, the question of whether the use of echoenhancing contrast agents leads to an increase in the velocity determined by Doppler ultrasound is controversial in the literature. Although Melany et al 13 came to the conclusion that USCAs do not significantly influence the measured velocity, Forsberg et al 14 and Fürst et al 15 described an increase of 20% to 45% in the maximum Doppler shift.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levovist was applied at concentrations of 400 mg/ml using either intravenous bolus injection [28, 29]or continuous infusion by means of a pump [32, 33]. No TCCS study has compared both methods of Levovist application, but preliminary experience obtained in peripheral arteries suggest that the use of an infusion pump may avoid color blooming and reduce spectral bubble noise and the need to alter Doppler system settings [34]. …”
Section: Ucasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intravenous infusion of contrast generally provides a longer duration of enhancement than does a bolus injection. 1,12 In the future, the infusion of contrast may be the preferred method of delivery for many radiological US applications, including hepatic scanning. …”
Section: Vascular Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of clinical studies using Levovist for contrastenhanced hepatic sonography have been reported. [1][2][3][12][13][14][15]22 Many reports have described the use of various blood pool agents and their ability to enhance the detection or conspicuity of hepatic lesions and to rule out the presence of tumors (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Tissue-specific Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%