1936
DOI: 10.1126/science.84.2172.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prolongation of the Corpus Luteum in the Pseudopregnant Rabbit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1937
1937
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consonant with the established luteotrophic action of oestrogen in the rabbit (Allen & Heckel, 1936). During pregnancy, oestrogen appears to be supplied by the follicles (Rennie, 1968 Fig.…”
Section: Secretion Ofprogesterone By CL Graftssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…This is consonant with the established luteotrophic action of oestrogen in the rabbit (Allen & Heckel, 1936). During pregnancy, oestrogen appears to be supplied by the follicles (Rennie, 1968 Fig.…”
Section: Secretion Ofprogesterone By CL Graftssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Estrogen treatment has a beneficial effect on corpora lutea in rats (Hohlweg, 1934;Desclin, 1935;Selye et al, 1935;Wolfe, 1935;Merckel and Nelson, 1940) and rabbits (Allen and Heckel, 1936;Heckel and Allen, 1939). Kidder et al (1955) found that stilbestrol caused luteinization of follicles when injected on day-ll of the estrual cycle of gilts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R ob son had reported from England that estrogen induced abortion in preg nant rabbits so G eorge H eckel repeated the experiments. Sure enough estrogen did induce abortion but H eckel noticed that if he continued the injection of estrogen the fetuses did, in fact, die but they were not aborted [38]. The question was: Why did the rabbits fail to abort their dead fetuses?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%