Administration of marijuana has consistently been shown to disrupt behavioral and CNS functions, including acquisition and choice discrimination learning, short-term memory, and time perception (Adams and Barratt 1976;Chait and Pierri 1992;Darley et al. 1973;Heishman et al. 1990;Kelly et al. 1993;Schulze et al. 1989;Vachon et al. 1974). These acute effects-which are evident in rats, monkeys, and humans-are presumably related to the disruptive action of ⌬ 9 THC in the brain. With regard to learning processes, some laboratory tasks like repeated acquisition and match to sample are shaped and maintained by reinforcement, e.g., food, money, or positive feedback (Kelly et al. 1993;Schulze et al. 1989). However, studies of acute marijuana effects on reinforcement-based learning have focused on the acquisition of response patterns rather than sensitivity to reinforcer frequency or magnitude, and less is known about the interaction between acute marijuana intoxication and behavioral sensitivity to reinforcement frequency.Two questions logically precede an inquiry into the effects of marijuana on sensitivity to reinforcement. Why would one expect any relationship? Why would such a relationship be important? At the behavioral level, acute administration of ⌬ 9 THC has repeatedly been shown to impair performance on learning tasks shaped and maintained by reinforcement Balster 1980, Kelly et al. 1993;Kamien et al. 1994;Schulze et al. 1989). Furthermore, on simulated tasks in which subjects could work to earn money, acute marijuana smoking decreased rates of working (and earnings)-an effect presumably mediated by changes in From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center -Houston.Address correspondence to: Scott D. Lane, Ph.D., Dept of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, UTSHC-Houston, 1300 Moursund St., Houston, TX 77030, Tel.: (713) 500-2620, Fax: (713) NO . 4 Marijuana and Sensitivity to Reinforcement 521 reinforcement or "motivational" processes (Foltin et al. 1989;Haney et al. 1997, Kagel et al. 1980Miles et al. 1974;Pihl and Sigal 1978). While the present study was not intended to address specific mechanisms, activity at the biochemical level provides a plausible rationale for disruptive effects of ⌬ 9 THC on reinforcement processes. Marijuana impacts both dopamine (DA) and cannabinoid (CB) receptor systems. Administration of ⌬ 9 THC modifies DA release in the "reward pathway", or mesolimbic DA system, projecting from the ventral tegmental area to the nucleus accumbens and into prefrontal cortex (Chen et al. 1990, Gardner and Lowinson 1991, Tanda et al. 1997. Since this pathway is a primary site involved in reinforcement processes (Fibiger and Phillips 1988;Koob and Swerdlow 1988;Wise and Rompre 1989), it follows that marijuana may have acute effects on behavioral sensitivity to reinforcement (see also Loeber and Yurgelun-Todd 1999). ⌬ 9 THC also directly modifies CB receptor function, including sites in the amygdala and hippocampus (Herkenham 1995;Heyser e...