2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prolonged, Controlled Daytime versus Delayed Eating Impacts Weight and Metabolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The association we observed between RAR and obesity is in accordance with previous studies that identified circadian disruption as a determinant of excess body fat accumulation ( 10 , 46 ). A growing body of experimental data suggests that the association between circadian disruption and obesity can be attributed to dysregulation of energy homeostasis caused by altered rhythmicity of hormones, primarily melatonin, leptin, and glucocorticoids ( 46 , 47 ).Later timing of food intake, which often results from circadian misalignment ( 48 ), has also been strongly linked to weight gain and obesity ( 49 , 50 ), with potential mediating mechanisms including reduced resting and postprandial energy expenditure and increased insulin resistance ( 51 , 52 ). On the other hand, because the fasting-feeding cycle contributes to synchronise peripheral circadian rhythms with the central clock, shifted mealtimes may also evoke or aggravate circadian disruption by uncoupling peripheral and central clocks ( 53 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association we observed between RAR and obesity is in accordance with previous studies that identified circadian disruption as a determinant of excess body fat accumulation ( 10 , 46 ). A growing body of experimental data suggests that the association between circadian disruption and obesity can be attributed to dysregulation of energy homeostasis caused by altered rhythmicity of hormones, primarily melatonin, leptin, and glucocorticoids ( 46 , 47 ).Later timing of food intake, which often results from circadian misalignment ( 48 ), has also been strongly linked to weight gain and obesity ( 49 , 50 ), with potential mediating mechanisms including reduced resting and postprandial energy expenditure and increased insulin resistance ( 51 , 52 ). On the other hand, because the fasting-feeding cycle contributes to synchronise peripheral circadian rhythms with the central clock, shifted mealtimes may also evoke or aggravate circadian disruption by uncoupling peripheral and central clocks ( 53 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, early time-restricted feeding (fasting from 1500 h daily) in men with prediabetes improved their insulin sensitivity within 5 weeks without losing weight, simply by extending their usual overnight fast to 18 hours (15). This effect on insulin sensitivity has since been confirmed in healthy young adults after only 2 weeks of fasting for 16 hours from 1600 h each day (16) and after 8 weeks of simply restricting typical daily meals to an 11-hour period ending at 1900 h (17). The other common form of intermittent fasting that routinely involves such protracted postabsorptive periods is complete alternate-day fasting (no energy intake whatsoever during fasting days), yet almost no research has examined fasting periods that span an entire day.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Some studies, but not all ( 17 20 ), have shown no associations between late eating and total energy intake (TEI) either cross-sectionally ( 13 ) or during weight loss ( 12 , 14 , 21 ). Based on these results and those of experimental studies exploring the effect of timing of food intake on metabolism ( 1 , 22 24 ), it has been suggested that late eating impacts body weight mainly through energy expenditure (e.g., lower thermic effect of foods) ( 24 ) rather than through energy intake ( 1 ). However, late eating resulted in higher daily appetite sensations in two recent cross-over randomised controlled trials in which food intake was fully controlled ( 25 , 26 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%