2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prolonged exposures of cerebellar granule neurons to S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) induce neuronal damage independently of peroxynitrite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the identification of other microglia-released factors involved in neuroprotection will likely contribute to explaining why other types of neurotoxicity (a shift of CGNs to nondepolarizing con-ditions or excitotoxicity) are significantly reverted by MCM, but not by exogenous SOD1. Differences in SOD1 neuroprotection against different toxic stimuli are in line with previous works that have or have not found neuroprotective effects of SOD1 in nonconditioned media, sometimes using very high amounts of exogenously added protein [60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. To further complicate this situation, it has to be considered that SOD1 may act on target cells both through its catalytic activity and through receptor interaction [46,47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the identification of other microglia-released factors involved in neuroprotection will likely contribute to explaining why other types of neurotoxicity (a shift of CGNs to nondepolarizing con-ditions or excitotoxicity) are significantly reverted by MCM, but not by exogenous SOD1. Differences in SOD1 neuroprotection against different toxic stimuli are in line with previous works that have or have not found neuroprotective effects of SOD1 in nonconditioned media, sometimes using very high amounts of exogenously added protein [60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. To further complicate this situation, it has to be considered that SOD1 may act on target cells both through its catalytic activity and through receptor interaction [46,47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…While superoxide dismutase is usually released by cells in its SOD3 isoform [58,59], also SOD1 is released by several cell lines [31,32,33,34]. Moreover, high concentrations of SOD1 may protect neurons from some toxic insults [60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. Here we show that SOD1 is produced and released by microglia and is a neuroprotective factor against 6-OHDA neurotoxicity in CGNs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Use of a thin outer layer of a highly crosslinked polymer could also be employed to further retard the leaching of SNAP from the E2As polymer. Applications of SNAP have been reported to cause hypotension [68, 69], hyperglycemia and impaired insulin secretion [69], and decreased cell viability [7072]. Endogenous thiols and superoxide dismutase will reduce many of these adverse effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The co-administration of intravenous fluids counteracted the blood pressure fall but this could pose significant difficulties in a clinical situation. SNAP administration has been shown to cause hypotension [35], hyperglycemia [36] and decreased cell viability [3739]. However, most of these adverse effects are ameliorated in the presence of endogenous thiols and superoxide dismutase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%