Prolyl aminopeptidases: Reclassification, properties, production and industrial applications

Identifying Candidate Genes for Sugar Accumulation in Sugarcane Cultivars: From a Syntenic Genomic Region to a Gene Coexpression Network

“…Synteny and collinearity have been used to compare and recover genomic regions of interest in sugarcane using sorghum (Ming et al, 1998;Paterson et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2010;Figueira et al, 2012;Mancini et al, 2018;Garsmeur et al, 2018;Thirugnanasambandam et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018;Sforça et al, 2019;Aono et al, 2021;Federico et al, 2022 andHealey et al, 2024) and miscanthus (Mitros et al, 2020 andZhang et al, 2021) genomes as references, revealing high gene retention Garsmeur et al, 2018;Sforça et al, 2019 andFeng et al, 2021). The comparison of the same region between sugarcane varieties and their ancestral species can provide insight into the genomic complexity of sugarcane.…”

“…Grasses with a reference genome, such as rice (International Rice Genome Sequencing Project and Sasaki, 2005), maize (Schnable et al, 2009), wheat (IWGSC et al, 2018), and miscanthus (Miscanthus sinensis) (Kim et al, 2014; Tsuruta et al, 2017), even sugarcane with an allele-defined genome of Saccharum spontaneum (Zhang et al, 2018) or a monoploid sequence reference for sugarcane (Garsmeur et al, 2018) and sorghum (McCormick et al, 2018), are commonly used as references for studies on the sugarcane genome (Thirugnanasambandam et al, 2018; Wang et al, 2021; Babu et al, 2022, Mancini et al, 2018; Garsmeur et al, 2018; Zhang et al, 2018, Zhang et al, 2022 and Healey et al, 2024). Recently, a highly representative genome of the R570 hybrid variety was presented to the scientific community (Healey et al, 2024).…”