2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05164-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prominent metallic surface conduction and the singular magnetic response of topological Dirac fermion in three-dimensional topological insulator Bi1.5Sb0.5Te1.7Se1.3

Abstract: We report semiconductor to metal-like crossover in the temperature dependence of resistivity (ρ) due to the switching of charge transport from bulk to surface channel in three-dimensional topological insulator Bi1.5Sb0.5Te1.7Se1.3. Unlike earlier studies, a much sharper drop in ρ(T) is observed below the crossover temperature due to the dominant surface conduction. Remarkably, the resistivity of the conducting surface channel follows a rarely observable T 2 dependence at low temperature, as predicted theoretic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. Similar field dependence of magnetic susceptibility has been reported for several topological insulators such as Bi 2 Se 3 , Bi 2 Te 3 , Sb 2 Te 3 , Bi 1.5 Sb 0.5 Te 1.7 Se 1.3[59][60][61] and narrow gap topological semimetals ZrTe 5 and LaBi[62,63], both with spin helical Dirac cone surface states.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…. Similar field dependence of magnetic susceptibility has been reported for several topological insulators such as Bi 2 Se 3 , Bi 2 Te 3 , Sb 2 Te 3 , Bi 1.5 Sb 0.5 Te 1.7 Se 1.3[59][60][61] and narrow gap topological semimetals ZrTe 5 and LaBi[62,63], both with spin helical Dirac cone surface states.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…In situ compensation method for ... 2 topological matter [27,28]. Despite this broad range of subjects, the investigated materials share one crucial common aspect: the objects of interest come on bulky substrates, or at least have to be fixed to a kind of rigid carrier, permitting mounting them onto adequate sample holders suitable for withstanding measurement cycles in wide ranges of temperature T and magnetic field H. However, the most popular multipurpose commercial SQUID magnetometers are not object-or element-selective probes, so the sought signal is very often (deeply) buried in the magnetic response of the ("nonmagnetic") carrier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has become routinely performed on a wide range of different types of samples such as ultrathin films [1,2,3,4,5,6], nanoparticles [7,8,9,10,11], nanowires [12,13], nanocomposites [14], quantum dots [15], graphene [16,17], dilute magnetic [18,19,20,21,22], and ferromagnetic semiconductor epilayers [23,24]. It currently enters the realms of organic spintronics [25], biology [26], and arXiv:1809.02346v3 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 5 Jul 2019 topological matter [27,28]. Despite this broad range of subjects, the investigated materials share one crucial common aspect: the objects of interest come on bulky substrates, or at least have to be fixed to a kind of rigid carrier, permitting mounting them onto adequate sample holders suitable for withstanding measurement cycles in wide ranges of temperature T and magnetic field H. However, the most popular multipurpose commercial SQUID magnetometers are not object-or element-selective probes, so the sought signal is very often (deeply) buried in the magnetic response of the ("nonmagnetic") carrier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A paramagnetic susceptibility peak at zero magnetic fields is reported in various kinds of topological materials. [1][2][3][4][5][6] It is speculated to originate from the spin texture at the Dirac point of the topological surface state. 7,8 The free alignment carrier spin is polarized under external magnetic fields and leads to the paramagnetic susceptibility peak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, none of these works support that the Fermi level is higher than the Dirac point in their systems. [1][2][3][4][5][6] Without this evidence, the mechanism of the paramagnetic susceptibility peak is questionable. Furthermore, a recent report shows a paramagnetic susceptibility peak at zero magnetic fields in a Bi 0.3 Sb 1.7 Te 3 topological insulator in which the Fermi level is below the Dirac point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%