2008
DOI: 10.1677/joe-07-0516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prominent pancreatic endocrinopathy and altered control of food intake disrupt energy homeostasis in prion diseases

Abstract: Prion diseases are fatal neurodegenerative diseases that can induce endocrinopathies. The basis of altered endocrine function in prion diseases is not well understood, and the purpose of this study was to investigate the spatiotemporal relationship between energy homeostasis and prion infection in hamsters inoculated with either the 139H strain of scrapie agent, which induces preclinical weight gain, or the HY strain of transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME), which induces clinical weight loss. Temporal chang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results reported herein clearly show that PrP Sc deposits in the pancreas are associated with the PNS; however, in natural and experimental CWD infections, PrP Sc has been observed in the islets of Langerhans [27], [29]. It has been suggested that disturbances in endocrine homeostasis that have been described for several TSE, might be the result of targeting the prion infection to the peripheral and/or central endocrine system [30]. However, a relationship between the alteration of pancreatic endocrine function and PrP Sc deposition in the islets of Langerhans has not been clearly shown [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results reported herein clearly show that PrP Sc deposits in the pancreas are associated with the PNS; however, in natural and experimental CWD infections, PrP Sc has been observed in the islets of Langerhans [27], [29]. It has been suggested that disturbances in endocrine homeostasis that have been described for several TSE, might be the result of targeting the prion infection to the peripheral and/or central endocrine system [30]. However, a relationship between the alteration of pancreatic endocrine function and PrP Sc deposition in the islets of Langerhans has not been clearly shown [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…It has been suggested that disturbances in endocrine homeostasis that have been described for several TSE, might be the result of targeting the prion infection to the peripheral and/or central endocrine system [30]. However, a relationship between the alteration of pancreatic endocrine function and PrP Sc deposition in the islets of Langerhans has not been clearly shown [30]. Our results suggest that PrP Sc deposition in the PNS (which innervates endocrine organs) may also participate in prion-induced endocrinopathies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…All samples were digested with PK prior to Western blot analysis. A significant (p<0.05) fold increase in PrP Sc abundance (Fig 4, panel A, lanes 4 and 6) was observed in the HY TME (3.16±0.14) and 139H (3.02±0.41) seeded groups compared to the starting material following one round of PMCA (Fig 4, panel A, lanes 3 and 5) indicating that LRS tissue can support PrP Sc formation similar to what has been observed in vivo [27,49]. A significant (p<0.05) 1.33±0.09 and 1.29±0.11 fold increase in PrP Sc abundance was observed in PMCA reactions seeded with DY TME brain homogenate (Fig 4, panel A, lane 8) or detergent enriched PK digested DY PrP-res (Fig 4, panel A, lane 10) respectively, compared to the starting reactions (Fig 4, panel A, lanes 7 and 9).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Obesity was previously reported in animals inoculated with 139H hamster-adapted scrapie agent (32). However, unlike 139H, in addition to overall weight gain, SSLOW-inoculated animals exhibited significant individual weight fluctuation during the clinical stage (Fig.…”
Section: Figure 6 Analysis Of Prpmentioning
confidence: 56%