2013
DOI: 10.1037/a0032670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PROMIS Pediatric Peer Relationships Scale: Development of a peer relationships item bank as part of social health measurement.

Abstract: Objective This study’s objective was to develop a measure of social health using item response theory as part of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Methods After candidate items were generated from review of prior literature, focus groups, expert input, and cognitive interviews, items were administered to youth aged 8–17 as part of the PROMIS pediatric large scale testing. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess dimensionality and to identify insta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
122
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
122
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[29] Patients age 8 and older completed the computerized adaptive testing version of the PROMIS Fatigue,[26] Mobility,[30] Upper Extremity,[30] Depressive Symptoms,[31] Anxiety,[31] and Peer Relationships item banks. [32] Self-report versions of those instruments are not available for patients 5–7 years of age. Clinical information was extracted from patients’ medical records.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29] Patients age 8 and older completed the computerized adaptive testing version of the PROMIS Fatigue,[26] Mobility,[30] Upper Extremity,[30] Depressive Symptoms,[31] Anxiety,[31] and Peer Relationships item banks. [32] Self-report versions of those instruments are not available for patients 5–7 years of age. Clinical information was extracted from patients’ medical records.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anxiety and depressive symptoms item banks have demonstrated a reliability coefficient of 0.85 [27]. No reliability coefficients are currently available for the peer relations domain; however, initial research suggests that the domain is reliable and valid [10]. Further, Kashikar-Zuck et al presented initial support for the validity of the PROMIS mobility, pain interference, fatigue, peer relationships, anxiety and depression measures in a clinical pediatric chronic pain population and demonstrated that the PROMIS short forms are valid and responsive to change [29].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher scores indicate better peer relationships and were inverted for consistency to indicate higher levels of dysfunction [10,65]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summed ratings are transformed to a possible range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better mental health. Social functioning was assessed with seven items from the PROMIS Peer Relationships Short Form item bank (0= never to 4= always ; α=.93) (DeWalt et al, 2013). Summed ratings are transformed to a t-score, with higher scores indicating better social functioning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%