2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promises and limits of law for a human-centric artificial intelligence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critical approaches also point out that despite regulatory initiatives explicitly invoking the need to incorporate human values into AI systems, they have the main objective of setting rules and standards to enable AI-based products and services to circulate in markets [20][21][22] and might serve to avoid or delay binding regulation [12,23]. Other critical studies argue that AI ethics fails to mitigate the racial, social, and environmental damage of AI technologies in any meaningful sense [24] and excludes alternative ethical practices [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical approaches also point out that despite regulatory initiatives explicitly invoking the need to incorporate human values into AI systems, they have the main objective of setting rules and standards to enable AI-based products and services to circulate in markets [20][21][22] and might serve to avoid or delay binding regulation [12,23]. Other critical studies argue that AI ethics fails to mitigate the racial, social, and environmental damage of AI technologies in any meaningful sense [24] and excludes alternative ethical practices [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%