Promising physicochemical technologies for poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment: A critical review

Hilares, Ruly Terán; Garay, Diego Fernando Atoche; Pagaza, Daniel Amílcar Pinto; Ahmed, Muhammad Ajaz; Andrade, Gilberto de Jesús Colina; Santos, Júlio César dos

doi:10.1016/j.jece.2021.105174

Cited by 42 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 154 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The composition of wastewater generated from poultry processing plants is complex and considered as high strength wastewater (Basitere 2017;Terán Hilares et al 2021). The main pollutant in PSW is organic matter which mostly originates from poultry blood (Bazrafshan et al 2012).…”

Section: Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The main pollutant in PSW is organic matter which mostly originates from poultry blood (Bazrafshan et al 2012). The detergents and disinfectants used for sanitization and cleaning purposes add to the complexity, representing about 18-20% of the total wastewater generated (Bustillo-Lecompte & Mehrvar 2017; Terán Hilares et al 2021). The composition generally depends on various factors such as the size of the slaughterhouse, the type of bird slaughtered, the processing loads and the method of operation used (Yaakob et al 2018;Aziz et al 2019;Akarsu et al 2021).…”

Section: Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The potable water is required for various operations (stunning and slaughtering; de-feathering; evisceration; trimming and carcass washing; de-boning; chilling; cleaning and waste disposal) as shown in Figure 1 ( Bustillo-Lecompte & Mehrvar 2017;Njoya 2017). An equally large amount of this used water is generated as wastewater laden with nutrients, fats, oil and greases (FOG), faeces, carcass debris, blood, feathers, pathogens and traces of heavy metals (Paulista et al 2018;Terán Hilares et al 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater using electrocoagulation: a review

Ngobeni

Basitere

Thole

2021

Water Practice and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Poultry slaughterhouses are generally large consumers of fresh water, which is exhausted as wastewater characterized by a high concentration of biological oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand COD, and fats, oil, and grease (FOG). Cost-effective methods are required for the treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater, with the aim of attaining a high quality effluent that can be reused in industrial processes to promote sustainability. As compared to conventional treatment methods, electrocoagulation is an efficient and low-cost system. Electrocoagulation is environmentally friendly, treating wastewater without the need of chemicals, thus limiting secondary pollution. The metal anodes initiate electrochemical reactions for coagulation and flocculation. Its distinct advantages include compact installation and simple operation. This paper offers a comprehensive review of recent literature that has been dedicated to utilizing electrocoagulation for poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment. This paper also examines aspects such as theory, potential applications, current applications, as well as economical assessment of the technique.

show abstract

Section: Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater using electrocoagulation: a review

Ngobeni

Basitere

Thole

2021

Water Practice and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…From 2018 to 2019, the world poultry market increased by 6% due to an increase in the per capita poultry consumption, which corresponds to 58 kg per person in the U.S., 57 kg per person in Brazil, and 48 kg per person in Peru. The high demand for poultry meat correspondingly increases freshwater consumption by poultry processing plants [3].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment of Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater with Membrane Technologies: A Review

Fatima

Kommalapati

2021

Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Poultry slaughterhouses produce a large amount of wastewater, which is usually treated by conventional methods. The traditional techniques face some challenges, especially the incapability of recovering valuable nutrients and reusing the treated water. Therefore, membrane technology has been widely adopted by researchers due to its enormous advantages over conventional methods. Pressure-driven membranes, such as microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF), and reverse osmosis (RO), have been studied to purify poultry slaughterhouse wastewater (PSWW) as a standalone process or an integrated process with other procedures. Membrane technology showed excellent performance by providing high efficiency for pollutant removal and the recovery of water and valuable products. It may remove approximately all the pollutants from PSWW and purify the water to the required level for discharge to the environment and even reuse for industrial poultry processing purposes while being economically efficient. This article comprehensively reviews the treatment and reuse of PSWW with MF, UF, NF, and RO. Most valuable nutrients can be recovered by UF, and high-quality water for reuse in poultry processing can be produced by RO from PSWW. The incredible performance of membrane technology indicates that membrane technology is an alternative approach for treating PSWW.

show abstract

“…Drinking water is no exception to this rule and contains salts and minerals, but in limited quantities and in a controlled manner; the reduction of these Citation: Gheibi agriculture lead to the production of wastewater because by the augmentation of waste materials such as urine, feces, detergents, fertilizers, and other pollutants in water and exceeding the standard amount of organic and mineral substances, water becomes useless for previous purposes [7,8]. Pollutants existing in wastewater, have the potential to spoil these few resources if released to nature [9][10][11][12]. therefore, the amounts of pollutants should be adjusted even for disposal in nature.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Economic evaluation of different biological municipal wastewater treatment systems and implementation of AHP method based on operating costs

Gheibi¹,

chahkandi²,

Kochakzadeh³

et al. 2021

Ann Syst Biol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In large cities, several hundred cubic meters of municipal wastewater is produced every day, which because of high levels of pollution, needs to be treated either for disposal or secondary use. Some of the most important indicators and pollutants that should be reduced to the standard range are VOC, TSS, TDS, BOD 5 , nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, and pathogens. Wastewater treatment plants, which have different capacities and procedures depending on the type and characteristics of the infl uent and effl uent, have large budgets of several hundred million for their life cycle. These costs include construction, maintenance, operation, chemical and biological materials, energy, and amortization. The costs associated with these environmentally essential infrastructures vary according to their treatment processes. This issue leads environmental engineers and policymakers to economic evaluation of various methods. This study with the help of CapdetWorks2.5 software has discussed three different methods of Complete Mixed Activated Sludge (CMAS), Aerated lagoon, and Oxidation Ditch in wastewater treatment plants in terms of operating costs. Evaluation and implementation of the decision-making system were conducted using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The results of the analysis showed that aeration ponds are the most optimal option in terms of operating costs with a value of 47.3%. The other two studied methods, namely CMAS and Oxidation Ditch, have a value of 24.9% and 27.9%, respectively.

show abstract

Promising physicochemical technologies for poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment: A critical review

Cited by 42 publications

References 154 publications

Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater using electrocoagulation: a review

Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater using electrocoagulation: a review

Treatment of Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater with Membrane Technologies: A Review

Economic evaluation of different biological municipal wastewater treatment systems and implementation of AHP method based on operating costs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About