Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781119206422.ch14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promote Procedural and Interactional Justice to Enhance Individual and Organizational Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…). Research suggests that fair procedures and communication processes can enhance both individual and organisational outcomes (Greenberg ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…). Research suggests that fair procedures and communication processes can enhance both individual and organisational outcomes (Greenberg ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisational justice refers to the study of people's perceptions of fairness in organisations (Greenberg 1987). There are three primary distinct forms of organisational justice: distributive (the perceived fairness of how outcomes are distributed), procedural (the perceived fairness of the procedures or manner in which outcomes are determined) and interactional justice which has two components: 'informational justice' (the manner in which outcomes and procedures are communicated) and 'interpersonal justice' (the expectation that things be explained in an adequate and respectful manner) (Bies & Moag 1986, Greenberg 2009). In the absence of interactional justice, individuals believe that they have been treated unfairly, which can lead to feelings of anger and outrage, resulting in retaliation against the source of these feelings (Aquino et al 2006).…”
Section: Organisational Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mattila (2001) stated that procedural justice is the perception of justice in terms of processes or procedures to recover from service failure. It refers to individuals' view of the fairness of the procedures and processes used to determine the results they received (Greenberg, 2009). Krishna, Dangayach, and Jain (2011) and Leticia Santos-Vijande, María Díaz-Martín, Suárez-Álvarez, and Belén del Río-Lanza (2013) indicated that interactional justice should be further separated into two different dimensions, namely, interpersonal justice and informational justice.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundation and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%