2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2022.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoter prediction in nannochloropsis based on densely connected convolutional neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods based on deep-learning primarily focus on training a neural network with DNA sequences or DNA sequences with epigenomic characteristics (such as histone modifications, chromatin accessibility, DNA methylation, or CpG islands) as inputs. Though some scholars have trained their networks with epigenome features [67,68,71,74,75,82], most have done so with only DNA sequences as inputs [69,70,72,73,[77][78][79][80][81]85,[88][89][90][98][99][100]102,[104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111]142]. Predicting enhancers and promoters directly from DNA sequences is believed to be more applicable than identifying them from multiple epigenomic features because the epigenomic characteristics data carries with it substantial sequencing costs, and a high rate of false positives.…”
Section: Methods For Identifying Enhancer/promoter Based On Deep-lear...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methods based on deep-learning primarily focus on training a neural network with DNA sequences or DNA sequences with epigenomic characteristics (such as histone modifications, chromatin accessibility, DNA methylation, or CpG islands) as inputs. Though some scholars have trained their networks with epigenome features [67,68,71,74,75,82], most have done so with only DNA sequences as inputs [69,70,72,73,[77][78][79][80][81]85,[88][89][90][98][99][100]102,[104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111]142]. Predicting enhancers and promoters directly from DNA sequences is believed to be more applicable than identifying them from multiple epigenomic features because the epigenomic characteristics data carries with it substantial sequencing costs, and a high rate of false positives.…”
Section: Methods For Identifying Enhancer/promoter Based On Deep-lear...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) Encoding a DNA sequence as in Section “Vector representations of DNA sequence”. (ii) Constructing a neural network to predict the presence of enhancers or promoters, such as CNN [69,73,76,78,81,85,88,98–100,102,104,111], transfer learning [110], or LSTM [82,88,108]. To establish the right characteristics and increase the accuracy of identifying an enhancer or promoter, the above methods either improve the input layer of DNA feature vector representation (for example, dna2vec) or neural network architectures or change the activation functions.…”
Section: Prediction Of Enhancer and Promotermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years DenseNet is also widely used in various fields, Pi et al. proposed propose a method called DNPPro based on densely connected convolutional neural networks to predict the promoter of Nannochloropsis [21]. Jiao et al.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by citations [5] and [21], this work proposes a DenseNet-based feature-weighted convolutional network recognition model for efficient classification of industrial parts. The highlights of this work are:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation