2014
DOI: 10.1038/nature13864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoterless gene targeting without nucleases ameliorates haemophilia B in mice

Abstract: Site-specific gene addition can allow stable transgene expression for gene therapy. When possible, this is preferred over the use of promiscuously integrating vectors, which are sometimes associated with clonal expansion1 and oncogenesis2. Site-specific endonucleases that can induce high rates of targeted genome editing are finding increasing applications in biological discovery and gene therapy3. However, two safety concerns persist: (1) endonuclease-associated adverse effects, both on4 and off-target5,6; and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

9
260
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(270 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
9
260
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One alternative strategy to increase the expression of restored genes is to integrate them in the albumin locus downstream of the endogenous albumin promoter. 82,83 Albumin is highly expressed in hepatocytes and the integration of the wild-type gene into this locus would ensure high expression.…”
Section: Key Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One alternative strategy to increase the expression of restored genes is to integrate them in the albumin locus downstream of the endogenous albumin promoter. 82,83 Albumin is highly expressed in hepatocytes and the integration of the wild-type gene into this locus would ensure high expression.…”
Section: Key Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study raised an intriguing possibility of in vivo promoterless gene targeting without the use of nucleases, thus greatly diminishing the risk of adverse off-target effects [5]. Comparably, however, the promoterless nuclease-independent site-specific gene targeting strategy illustrated by Barzel et al [5] is effective in only certain therapeutic effects conferred by gene targeting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although such approaches were pioneered in the 1990s 3 , before the advent of the nuclease-based gene editing platforms, their use and progression to clinical trials since has been held back by issues including frequencies of gene editing that are typically well below those needed for potential therapeutic applications. However, in the past 2 years, results with a diverse group of gene editing platforms -ranging from recombinogenic adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors, to various oligonucleotide-only approaches, to nucleobase modification (TABLE 1) -have demonstrated substantially improved gene editing efficiencies [4][5][6][7][8][9] , spurring renewed interest in such approaches. Moreover, these platforms do not require cleavage of the targeted DNA to achieve gene editing -a characteristic of nuclease-based mechanisms that has raised concerns about random insertion and deletions (indels) that occur in some proportion of the targeted cleavage sites and their potential for off-target genotoxicity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the published efficiency of this technology is only in the 1% range, the long repair template allows for site-directed gene replacement. By directing integration of a replacement factor IX 'gene' (cDNA) to the highly expressed albumin locus with a variant of recombinant AAV in a mouse haemophilia model, 7-20% of normal factor IX was expressed in the serum, resulting in correction of the mutant phenotype without exogenous programmable nucleases 4 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation