“…Although such approaches were pioneered in the 1990s 3 , before the advent of the nuclease-based gene editing platforms, their use and progression to clinical trials since has been held back by issues including frequencies of gene editing that are typically well below those needed for potential therapeutic applications. However, in the past 2 years, results with a diverse group of gene editing platforms -ranging from recombinogenic adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors, to various oligonucleotide-only approaches, to nucleobase modification (TABLE 1) -have demonstrated substantially improved gene editing efficiencies [4][5][6][7][8][9] , spurring renewed interest in such approaches. Moreover, these platforms do not require cleavage of the targeted DNA to achieve gene editing -a characteristic of nuclease-based mechanisms that has raised concerns about random insertion and deletions (indels) that occur in some proportion of the targeted cleavage sites and their potential for off-target genotoxicity.…”