2017
DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1346581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting beliefs in the inalienability of human rights by attributing uniquely human emotions through multiple categorization

Abstract: The combination of multiple categorization (i.e., the use of multiple criteria to define others) and human identity-the superordinate group of human beings-has recently been highlighted as a method to reduce implicit (i.e., attribution of secondary emotions) and explicit (i.e., attribution of human rights) dehumanization toward Blacks. In two studies aimed to replicate such evidence the mediating role of secondary emotions in explaining the impact of multiple and human categorization in reducing dehumanization… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to test whether intragroup interdependence mediates the effects of the type of organizational structure on TMMs among team members and on employees' job satisfaction and work engagement ( hypothesis 5 ) separate bootstrapping simple mediation analyses (5,000 resamples) were carried out. This allowed testing for direct and indirect effects in simple mediation models as prescribed by Preacher and Hayes (; see also Albarello, Crisp, & Rubini, ; Albarello, Foroni, Hewstone, & Rubini, ; Albarello & Rubini, ). The PROCESS 2.15 macro (model 4, which provides κ 2 as an indicator of effects size for mediation models; Preacher & Kelley, ) for SPSS was employed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to test whether intragroup interdependence mediates the effects of the type of organizational structure on TMMs among team members and on employees' job satisfaction and work engagement ( hypothesis 5 ) separate bootstrapping simple mediation analyses (5,000 resamples) were carried out. This allowed testing for direct and indirect effects in simple mediation models as prescribed by Preacher and Hayes (; see also Albarello, Crisp, & Rubini, ; Albarello, Foroni, Hewstone, & Rubini, ; Albarello & Rubini, ). The PROCESS 2.15 macro (model 4, which provides κ 2 as an indicator of effects size for mediation models; Preacher & Kelley, ) for SPSS was employed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further study by Albarello, Crisp and Rubini (2018) examined both mediators and moderators of multiple categorization effects on outgroup re-humanization. Priming multiple categorizations of Black people (i.e., "a Black, Christian, male, young, born in Italy from immigrant parents") together with White respondents' super-ordinate identity (by making human identity salient) reduced dehumanization of Black people in general and this, in turn, increased the discrimination (e.g., Hall & Crisp, 2005).…”
Section: Mediators and Moderators Of Outgroup Re-humanizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test whether implicit linguistic discrimination mediates the effect of threat on affective prejudice toward Roma (Hypothesis 3), bootstrapping mediational analysis (5,000 resamples) was conducted using the methods described by Hayes and Preacher (2014) for mediational models employing multicategorical independent variables (see Albarello & Rubini, 2017; Moscatelli et al, 2014). The PROCESS 2.15 (Model 4) macro for SPSS was employed since it allows entering simultaneously in the regression model the dummy variables expressing the different levels of the independent variable (i.e., D 1 contrasted the no-threat [coded 0] and realistic threat [coded 1] conditions; D 2 compared the no-threat [coded 0] and the symbolic threat [coded 1] conditions).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale supporting this goal may seem counterintuitive since implicit and explicit measures of prejudice and discrimination are often not correlated (Maass et al, 2000). However, Albarello and Rubini (2017) found evidence of the mediational role of implicit measures of (de) humanization (i.e., attribution of secondary emotions; Leyens et al, 2000) on the explicit measures of attribution of human rights to Blacks. They rooted their assumption on the contribution by Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006) who distinguished between implicit associative versus explicit propositional processes.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation