2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nwh.2020.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting Breastfeeding and Lactation Among Mothers of Premature Newborns in a Hospital in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…After removing duplicates, the titles/abstracts of 69 articles were screened, and 49 articles were excluded. We reviewed the full text of 20 studies; 16 studies (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) were included in systematic review and four studies (33)(34)(35)(36) were excluded because of insufficient primary outcomes or same study cohort; 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis for the primary outcome (17-21, 23, 24, 27-32), another 3 studies were excluded due to insufficient dichotomous data. Figure 1 shows the detailed flow chart.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…After removing duplicates, the titles/abstracts of 69 articles were screened, and 49 articles were excluded. We reviewed the full text of 20 studies; 16 studies (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) were included in systematic review and four studies (33)(34)(35)(36) were excluded because of insufficient primary outcomes or same study cohort; 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis for the primary outcome (17-21, 23, 24, 27-32), another 3 studies were excluded due to insufficient dichotomous data. Figure 1 shows the detailed flow chart.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies (641 infants) ( 20 , 31 , 32 ) reported the rate of any breastfeeding during hospitalization, with high heterogeneity ( I 2 = 90%), and QI improved the rate of any breastfeeding during hospitalization ( RR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.09–3.29, P = 0.02) ( Figure 4 ). Subgroup analysis by country showed that heterogeneity was low among the Chinese studies ( I 2 = 0%), and the rate was significantly improved after QI ( RR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.94–2.83, P < 0.00001), which may be related to the higher compliance and acceptance of the participants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations