Tri(2,4-dimethyl-5-sulfonatophenyl)phosphine trisodium (TXPTS·Na3) and tri(4-methoxy-2-methyl-5-sulfonatophenyl)phosphine trisodium (TMAPTS·Na3) both provide more active catalysts for Suzuki and Sonogashira couplings of aryl bromides in aqueous solvents than tri(3-sulfonatophenyl)phosphine trisodium (TPPTS·Na3). In the Heck coupling, TXPTS·Na3 provides the most effective catalyst system. Cone angles determined from DFT-optimized structures show that both TXPTS·Na3 (206°) and TMAPTS·Na3 (208°) are significantly larger than TPPTS·Na3 (165°). The identity of the counterion had a significant effect on the calculated cone angles for these ligands. The electronic properties of these ligands determined by the CO stretching frequencies of trans-RhL2(Cl)CO complexes were identical, although calculated electronic parameters suggest subtle differences between these ligands. Similar to TPPTS·Na3, both TXPTS·Na3 and TMAPTS·Na3 react with Pd(OAc)2 in aqueous solvents to give LnPd0 complexes and the corresponding phosphine oxide. The reduction of palladium(II) by TXPTS·Na3 is significantly slower than is seen with TMAPTS·Na3 or TPPTS·Na3 at room temperature. Evidence of palladacycle complexes derived from TXPTS·Na3 and TMAPTS·Na3 by activation of an ortho-methyl substituent was also observed in ligand coordination studies and under catalytic reaction conditions.