1991
DOI: 10.1016/0301-4215(91)90152-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting energy conservation in small and medium-sized companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the lack of confidence in governmental sponsored energy audits together with the high trust in the Swedish Foundry Association seem to indicate that campaigns such as sponsored energy audits are more effective if carried out by other more trusted actors than government associations. Similar results were found in other countries and sectors (de Groot et al, 2001;Gruber and Brand, 1991;Stern and Aronsson, 1984).…”
Section: Concluding Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Also, the lack of confidence in governmental sponsored energy audits together with the high trust in the Swedish Foundry Association seem to indicate that campaigns such as sponsored energy audits are more effective if carried out by other more trusted actors than government associations. Similar results were found in other countries and sectors (de Groot et al, 2001;Gruber and Brand, 1991;Stern and Aronsson, 1984).…”
Section: Concluding Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Gruber and Brand (1991) observed in an empirical study covering 500 small and medium-sized German companies from a total of eight different industries that less than 50% of the surveyed firms conduct a systematic economic calculation to determine the return on investment (ROI). The average required payback period for those companies that perform investment calculations was at that point of time about four years.…”
Section: Implementation/operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both policy documents and the academic literature state that cost-effective energy measures are not always implemented. This discrepancy between optimal and actual implementation is often referred to as the energy efficiency gap, which has been illustrated and examined in multiple academic articles (e.g., York et al, 1978;Blumstein et al, 1980;Stern and Aronsson, 1984;Hirst and Brown, 1990;Gruber and Brand, 1991;Stern, 1992;DeCanio, 1993;Jaffe and Stavins, 1994;Sanstad and Howarth, 1994;Weber, 1997;Ostertag, 1999;Sorrell et al, 2000;Brown, 2001;de Groot et al, 2001;Schleich, 2004;Sorrell et al, 2004;Thollander, 2006, Thollander et al, 2007;Rohdin et al, 2007;Thollander and Ottosson, 2008;Schleich and Gruber, 2008;Sardianou, 2008;Hasanbeigi et al, 2010;Fleiter et al, 2011;Trianni and Cagno, 2011;Chai and Yeo, 2012). One of the most cited of these articles is by Jaffe and Stavins (1994), who explain the gap and how its extent differs depending on the definition of energy efficiency potential used and the perspective addressed.…”
Section: The Energy Efficiency Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%