2016
DOI: 10.1093/isp/ekv024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting Global Empathy and Engagement through Real-Time Problem-Based Simulations

Abstract: We introduce a real-time problem-based simulation in which students are tasked with drafting policy to address the challenge of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in postearthquake Haiti from a variety of stakeholder perspectives. Students who participated in the simulation completed a quantitative survey as a pretest/posttest on global empathy, political awareness, and civic engagement, and provided qualitative data through postsimulation focus groups. The simulation was run in four courses across three camp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We argue that there is nothing magical about educational goals or travel occurring in the context of study abroad, especially when experience is privileged over formal study, as in ISL. In fact, Zappile, Beers, and Raymond [17] found that students who engage in "real-time problem-based simulation" can have significant increases in their scores on survey items that measure "global empathy" without ever leaving the classroom. There is reason to question the sometimes hotly asserted difference between students and tourists.…”
Section: Cross-cultural Understanding Is Not a Givenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argue that there is nothing magical about educational goals or travel occurring in the context of study abroad, especially when experience is privileged over formal study, as in ISL. In fact, Zappile, Beers, and Raymond [17] found that students who engage in "real-time problem-based simulation" can have significant increases in their scores on survey items that measure "global empathy" without ever leaving the classroom. There is reason to question the sometimes hotly asserted difference between students and tourists.…”
Section: Cross-cultural Understanding Is Not a Givenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way simulations might increase civic engagement is by increasing awareness of and interest in global challenges or disasters. Zappile, Beers and Raymond (2017) ran simulations in four courses across three campuses related to the situation in post-earthquake Haiti and found that students reported gains in global engagement and increased feelings of global citizenship. In addition, political simulations can increase student interest in the political process.…”
Section: Simulations and Civic Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiential learning is a key component to developing emotional intelligence within organizations (Cherniss et al, 1998) and in provider training programs (Gerdes, Segal, Jackson, & Mullins, 2011). Simulations prove effective in both personal empathy building (Bachen, Hernández-Ramos, & Raphael, 2012; Zappile, Beers, & Raymond, 2016) and teaching about processes in larger social systems, like governments (Sands & Shelton, 2010). Programs like the Oxfam Hunger Banquet, the Paper Bag Game, and Development Monopoly have been used to place participants in role-play environments that illuminate the personal effects of complex social phenomena like poverty and inequality (Ansoms & Geenen, 2012; Davidson, Preez, Gibb, & Nel, 2009; Krain & Shadle, 2006).…”
Section: Building Empathy and Knowledge Through Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small sample size (n=9) of our pilot program is the most important limitation to note, as it was difficult to definitely show effects on participant empathy and knowledge. Moving forward, it would be valuable to not only test the simulation with more participants, but also at multiple sites (e.g., Zappile et al, 2016), perhaps using the consortium model of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (Strachan & Bennion, 2016). Additional research is also necessary in order to evaluate the pedagogical trade-offs of altering our presented format and to more thoroughly investigate the impact on participant empathy and knowledge.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%