2020
DOI: 10.18326/rgt.v13i2.293-314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting Personal Learning Environment for Emerging Academic Writing for Publication for Higher Education Students

Abstract: Academic writing for publication in higher education is cognitively and linguistically complex. University students grapple with academic writing for publication because of academic genre/convention, linguistic competence, and academic literacy among others. For this reason, a learning environment does matter. The Personal Learning Environment (PLE) is a learner-controlled environment for language learning. To examine this issue, a qualitative study with an action research design conducted with 28 graduate stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the present systematic review and trend analysis can become a guidance platform for researchers, educators, policymakers or even journal publishers for future research in PLEs research. The current systematic review is significant and Transformational leadership and constructivism [175] Constructivism [33], [39], [45], [49], [79], [84], [91], [93], [99], [101], [123], [127], [131], [138[, [159] Connectivism & self-regulated learning [75] Self-learning [87], [103], [128], [176] Socio-cultural theory [50] Lifelong learning [125], [151], 161] TAM [61] Connectivism [51], [144], [158] Constructivism & Connectivism [76] Self-Reported Learning [149], [177] Self-directed + Connectivism [53] Lifelong theory [59] Technology-enhanced learning [178] Personal construct theory [179] Technology acceptance models [152] Self-disclosure learning [129] Situated Learning [82] Collaborative learning [106] Constructivism+ Searle"s theory [112] Mobile learning theories [72] Epistemological [180] IX. CONCLUSION indispensable in reviewing journal articles that discussed PLEs between 2000 and 2020.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the present systematic review and trend analysis can become a guidance platform for researchers, educators, policymakers or even journal publishers for future research in PLEs research. The current systematic review is significant and Transformational leadership and constructivism [175] Constructivism [33], [39], [45], [49], [79], [84], [91], [93], [99], [101], [123], [127], [131], [138[, [159] Connectivism & self-regulated learning [75] Self-learning [87], [103], [128], [176] Socio-cultural theory [50] Lifelong learning [125], [151], 161] TAM [61] Connectivism [51], [144], [158] Constructivism & Connectivism [76] Self-Reported Learning [149], [177] Self-directed + Connectivism [53] Lifelong theory [59] Technology-enhanced learning [178] Personal construct theory [179] Technology acceptance models [152] Self-disclosure learning [129] Situated Learning [82] Collaborative learning [106] Constructivism+ Searle"s theory [112] Mobile learning theories [72] Epistemological [180] IX. CONCLUSION indispensable in reviewing journal articles that discussed PLEs between 2000 and 2020.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include short-term publication courses and longer-term writing support groups (Mathew et al, 2006), English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP) courses (Li & Flowerdew, 2020), one-on-one mentorship (Busse et al, 2022), and multiple source-based writing tasks (Allagui, 2023). Additionally, Personal Learning Environments (PLEs) have been promoted to assist students (Drajati & Wisudawati, 2020). Yet, there remains a scarcity of research on the use of PLEs in scaffolding Ph.D. students' writing for publication.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%