Promoting population health with public-private partnerships: Where’s the evidence?

Abstract

Background: Although public-private partnerships have become common in the health sector, the evidence supporting their effectiveness is limited, and when the products or services provided by the private partner are harmful to health inherent conflicts of interest may be difficult to overcome. The objective of this study is to appraise the evidence describing process or effectiveness of public-private partnerships (PPPs) that aim to promote population health, and analyse how characteristics such as independence or competing interests influence the results of their evaluation. Methods: We carried out a systematic search of Medline and Web of Science to identify scientific reports evaluating the process or effectiveness of PPPs that aim to promote population health. Two reviewers applied inclusion criteria, extracted and evaluated study quality. We classified PPPs according to the health problem tackled, the independence of the evaluation, and the potential for competition between business interests of the private partner and health promotion activity undertaken. We classified the conclusions of the evaluation as positive (supportive/tentatively supportive) or negative (semi-critical/critical). Results: We identified 36 studies evaluating 25 PPPs. Evaluations that were favourable to the use of PPPs in health promotion were more frequently classed as "not independent" and of poor quality. On the other hand, negative evaluations were more common when the PPP involved a private partner with a high potential for competition between the health promotion activity undertaken and their financial interests. PPPs that sought to prevent noncommunicable diseases were more frequently negatively evaluated compared to PPPs tackling infectious disease or other types of health problem. Almost all of the evaluations evaluated process, with only 2 papers reporting quantitative health related outcomes. Conclusions: There is still a lack of sound evidence supporting the effectiveness of public-private partnerships in health promotion, and the evidence base is skewed by non-independent evaluations. Public health actors should abstain from engaging in agreements with industries whose business interests have a high potential for competition with the health promotion activity undertaken.

Learning from past pandemic governance: Early response and Public-Private Partnerships in testing of COVID-19 in South Korea

“…Algaissi et al, 2020 , Amsden, 1992 , Baqui et al, August 2020 , Béland, September 2010 , Buse and Harmer, June 2004 , Candido et al, 2020 , Cho, December 2014 , Choung et al, February 2014 , Cooke, December 2017 , Dubey, 2020 , Erlingsson and Brysiewicz, September 2017 , Eyerkaufer et al, 2016 , Forum, 2016 , Fudenberg et al, June 1983 , Gao, et al, 2020 , Hsieh and Shannon, November 2005 , Keane and Weerasinghe, 2008 , Kim et al, 2019 , Ku et al, 2018 , Lee and Ki, 2015 , Lee et al, November 2020 , Lee and Malerba, March 2017 , Lv et al, July 2020 , Mettler, 2014 , Nishtar, December 2004 , Pardo, 2019 , Paital et al, 2020 , Park, May 2013 , Parker et al, December 2019 , Pei et al, 2020 , Perry et al, 2016 , Pierson, July 1993 , Rao, February 2013 , Ruckert and Labonté, 2014 , Sell and Power, 2003 , Sonn and Kang, 2016 , Steyer and Gilbert, February 2013 , Tavares and Lima, 2020 , Lancet, March 2020 , Turner et al, October 2018 , Vijgen et al, 2008 , Yi, Joseph, and Wondong Lee. “Pandemic Nationalism in South Korea.” Society, 2020 , Yoon, July 2015 .…”

Trends in and determinants of visiting private health facilities for maternal and child health care in Nepal: comparison of three Nepal demographic health surveys, 2006, 2011, and 2016

“…The increase in the use of private health services over time may also be due to increased attention to the public private partnership approach in health care services in both high-income countries and LMICs [ 37 ]. In Nepal, the 1991 National Health Policy provided avenues for private institutions to enter the health sector.…”

Enhancing the blood safety program in Myanmar: Report on projects of global extension of medical technologies of Japan

“…Public-private partnerships in health care have gained considerable attention over the last two decades, and especially after setting of the Sustainable Development Goals in 2015 (10,11). However, publicprivate partnerships are also associated with several risks, including conflicting visions and scopes of activity for corporations and public health agencies (12).…”