1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(18)30820-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting Prevention Services in Primary Care: A Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional venue for message dissemination is the primary health care setting. Patients who visit for other services can be screened for high-risk sexual behavior and be provided risk reduction counseling and education, along with referrals to help resources (Gerbert, Bronstone, McPhee, Pantilat, & Allerton, 1999; Johns, Hovell, Drastal, Lamke, & Patrick, 1992). This approach of using a scheduled visit to screen for additional risks has been used successfully by some health care organizations (e.g., screening for domestic violence issues at early prenatal clinic visits).…”
Section: Effective Transfer Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional venue for message dissemination is the primary health care setting. Patients who visit for other services can be screened for high-risk sexual behavior and be provided risk reduction counseling and education, along with referrals to help resources (Gerbert, Bronstone, McPhee, Pantilat, & Allerton, 1999; Johns, Hovell, Drastal, Lamke, & Patrick, 1992). This approach of using a scheduled visit to screen for additional risks has been used successfully by some health care organizations (e.g., screening for domestic violence issues at early prenatal clinic visits).…”
Section: Effective Transfer Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have demonstrated the benefits of written guidelines on the delivery of preventive care [Johns et al, 1992;Jackson, 1996]. In the article by Clericuzio, preventive strategies for several childhood cancer syndromes are summarized.…”
Section: Use Of Preventive Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Reminders directed to providers or patients (Brimberry 1988;Lar son et al 1979;Larson et al 1982;Vallez et al 1985;Thompson et al 1986;McDowell, Newell, andRosser 1986, 1989;Mullooly 1987;Leininger et al 1996) • Delegation of activities (Frame, Kowulich, and Llewellyn 1984) • Administrative rules (McGowan and Finland 1974;Durbin, Lapidas, and Goldmann 1981;Vayda and Mindell 1982;Ruchlin, Finkel, and McCarthy 1982;M artin et al 1982;Gryskiewicz and Detmer 1983;W ong, McCarron, and Shaw 1983) • Presence of local com munity standards or norms (Pineault 1976;Zelnio 1982;Dorsey 1983;Hartzema and Christensen 1983;Ep stein, Begg, and McNeil 1983;W illiams and Williams 1987) • Flow sheets, checklists, brief scripts as primary care "tools," or guidelines (Cohen et al 1982;Prislin, Vandenbark, and Clarkson 1986;Madlon-Kay 1987;Cheney and Ramsdel 1987;Shank, Pow ell, and Llewelyn 1989;D ietrich et al 1992;Johns et al 1992;Britt et al 1994) • Exam room posters (Lane, Polednak, and Burg 1991;Savage 1991) • Stickers affixed to charts identifying patient's health risks. The concept of smoking status as a vital sign is one example (Cohen et al 1987(Cohen et al , 1989Solberg et al 1990 (Lerman et al 1992)…”
Section: Conceptual B Asis Fo R the Intervention M Odelmentioning
confidence: 99%