2011
DOI: 10.1080/19415532.2012.665773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting primary pupils’ social-emotional learning and pro-social behaviour: longitudinal evaluation of the Together 4 All Programme in Northern Ireland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[24][25][26][27][28][29] With one exception, 27 these US trials have consistently found small intervention effects across the range of outcomes noted at the outset of this chapter. Elsewhere in the world, RCTs of PATHS have been conducted in Switzerland, 30 Croatia 31 and the UK, 32,33 but have generally failed to replicate the positive effects noted above, with null intention-to-treat (ITT) results reported in all but one of the trials. The exception was a trial of PATHS conducted in Northern Ireland, which found small, positive effects for a range of outcomes, including pro-social and aggressive behaviour.…”
Section: The Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies Curriculummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][27][28][29] With one exception, 27 these US trials have consistently found small intervention effects across the range of outcomes noted at the outset of this chapter. Elsewhere in the world, RCTs of PATHS have been conducted in Switzerland, 30 Croatia 31 and the UK, 32,33 but have generally failed to replicate the positive effects noted above, with null intention-to-treat (ITT) results reported in all but one of the trials. The exception was a trial of PATHS conducted in Northern Ireland, which found small, positive effects for a range of outcomes, including pro-social and aggressive behaviour.…”
Section: The Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies Curriculummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research may wish to include measures of 'general' SEL implementation/ quality in both treatment and control schools to explore this analytically. Furthermore, the current study was conducted in the UK, in which the effects of PATHS documented through other trials have been weaker and more mixed (Ross et al 2011) and in some cases null (Berry et al 2016) than in the US-based studies that preceded them. Therefore, the null results observed here may reflect a wider issue pertaining to cultural transferability (Lendrum and Wigelsworth 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the two RCTs of PATHS in the UK to date yielded mixed findings, and assessment of outcomes was focused on children's social and emotional skills, behaviour and/or mental health rather than their academic attainment. Thus, Ross et al's (2011) study of a Northern Irish cultural adaptation of the programme found that PATHS (rebranded as 'Together 4 All') produced effects that were 'weak and inconsistent, but generally in a positive direction' (p. 61), while a major trial of PATHS in Birmingham, England, yielded null results (Berry et al 2016). The study reported herein is the third UK RCT of PATHS, and the first to assess its impact on children's academic attainment.…”
Section: Paths In the Ukmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Numerous randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have consistently established small-to-moderate effects on a range of outcomes, including children's social and emotional skills, externalising problems (e.g. aggressive behaviour) and academic attainment [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. However, many trials finding positive effects of PATHS have involved or been led by the developer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%