2018
DOI: 10.1177/2051570718813848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting pro-environmental behaviours through induced hypocrisy

Abstract: In the field of ethical consumption, research in recent years has attempted to explain the gap between principles and actual behaviour. Three experimental studies show that when the contradiction between what individuals say and what they do is made salient in the field of environmental protection, that is to say in a situation of induced hypocrisy, they indirectly reduce the resulting cognitive dissonance by being more altruistic towards associations that act for the environment but not towards humanitarian a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This friction creates conflict or incongruence between an individual's cognitions, beliefs, or values and their actual behaviour or choices regarding sustainability. This phenomenon is known as cognitive dissonance [192,197,198] and is the subject of research in the field of Design for Sustainable Behavior, which seeks to address it via solutions such as nudges, public commitment [199], induced hypocrisy [200], or the development of a sustainable consumption pattern [201]. Weder et al [192] offered interesting findings, which proposed a new version of narrative inquiry to explain sustainability-related cognitive dissonance.…”
Section: Bottlenecks For Citizens' Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This friction creates conflict or incongruence between an individual's cognitions, beliefs, or values and their actual behaviour or choices regarding sustainability. This phenomenon is known as cognitive dissonance [192,197,198] and is the subject of research in the field of Design for Sustainable Behavior, which seeks to address it via solutions such as nudges, public commitment [199], induced hypocrisy [200], or the development of a sustainable consumption pattern [201]. Weder et al [192] offered interesting findings, which proposed a new version of narrative inquiry to explain sustainability-related cognitive dissonance.…”
Section: Bottlenecks For Citizens' Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-persuasion techniques are indirect, stronger, deeper, and longer lasting because they convince people that they are internally motivated to change their attitudes or behaviors (Aronson, 1999 ). Effects of self-persuasion have been documented in marketing (Bernritter et al, 2017 ), education (Canning & Harackiewicz, 2015 ), health communication (Baldwin et al, 2021 ; Loman et al, 2018 ), green behavior (Odou et al, 2019 ), interpersonal relationships (Wong et al, 2022 ), and computer science domains (Krsek et al, 2022 ). As a type of self-persuasion, we suggest that hypocrisy induction evokes internal motivations to change behavior specifically in anti-cyberbullying CSR campaigns.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, individuals with Mexican higher education students biospheric and altruistic values have been shown to engage in more climate change mitigation actions than individuals with selfish values (Howell and Allen, 2017;Whitley et al, 2018). For these reasons, several campaigns for promoting pro-environmental behaviors in individuals have focused on altruistic or biospheric values (Evans et al, 2013;Gifford and Comeau, 2011;Odou et al, 2019;van Prooijen and Sparks, 2014). Large-scale national studies have also captured distinct values or "worldviews" within populaces regarding engagement with the issue of climate change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%