2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting resident-tourist interaction quality when residents are expected to be hospitable hosts at destinations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, Eusébio et al (2018) found that HTI is related to residents' perceived positive effects and their ATT. More recently, Xiong et al (2021) found that HTI quality was positively related to their attitudes towards tourism development. Thus, we put forward the following hypotheses for testing: H4: Residents' HTI positively influence their ATT.…”
Section: Host-tourist Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, Eusébio et al (2018) found that HTI is related to residents' perceived positive effects and their ATT. More recently, Xiong et al (2021) found that HTI quality was positively related to their attitudes towards tourism development. Thus, we put forward the following hypotheses for testing: H4: Residents' HTI positively influence their ATT.…”
Section: Host-tourist Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the research gap necessitates expanding the literature in this field to understand why residents support tourism in their communities and how the influencing factors affect each other. To be specific, the scientific discourse should increase its emphasis on deeper examinations of residents' HTI, PI, CT and attitudes to achieve sustainable tourism development (Wang and Zhang, 2020;Xiong et al, 2021;Zaman and Aktan, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conflict can further result in unmet tourist expectations and potential negative attitudes from residents with respect to tourism development. In addition, as residents may interact with tourists on many occasions regardless of their involvement in tourism development, residents may further experience inconvenience (e.g., Lai & Hitchcock, 2017), unfairness (e.g., S. Kim & Kang, 2020), stress as well as emotional labor (e.g., Jordan et al, 2021; Xiong et al, 2021), especially in destinations with mass tourism or overtourism (Gössling et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…emotional attachment, experiences, intangible, tangible values) emerge as place meanings, and spatial relations to places differ amongst individuals. When residents employ different place elements such as language, customs, beliefs, and values in their interactions with visitors to shape their experience and perceptions of the place (Xiong et al, 2021), they become true co-producers, co-owners, and co-consumers of the destination brand. At this stage, the roles of residents are critical as their word of mouth is seen as a more trustworthy and authentic source of information (Uchinaka et al, 2019), through which the brand persona can be articulated more organically.…”
Section: Residents’ Stories For Destination Brandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is reflected in Figure 1, where residents’ stories are used to position the destination brand, leaving unique impressions in the tourist's mind about the destination and informing their perceptions and image. Here, residents’ stories can be used to bridge the gap between place as perceived (destination image) and place as is, thereby reducing potential dissonance when tourists discover that there is a mismatch between the projected image (brand communication) and reality (visitor experience) (Xiong et al, 2021). In doing this, the brand becomes an extension of the place's identity and increases the likelihood of being embraced and supported by the internal stakeholders (Saraniemi and Komppula, 2017).…”
Section: Residents’ Stories For Destination Brandingmentioning
confidence: 99%