Promoting Safety in Hypnosis: A Clinical Instrument for the Assessment of Alertness

Abstract

Hypnosis has long demonstrated its power to facilitate various approaches to psychotherapy. Like other potent modalities, hypnosis may produce unwanted effects. Although its negative sequelae are usually mild and transient, more serious complications may occur. Recently, attention has been drawn to the powerful role of failures of dehypnosis or alerting/realerting in producing unwanted effects. Traditionally, alerting has been viewed as a relatively uncomplicated process that requires little more than the simple suggestion that the subject will return or awaken from trance, and exiting from trance has generally been considered the cessation of the phenomena suggested during induction and thereafter. Newer findings challenge these assumptions and suggest that restoring the subject to a prehypnotic baseline level of alertness is of equal or greater importance. Here, I describe the Howard Alertness Scale (HAS), with which subjects can be made aware of their baseline levels of alertness to help them understand the unique ways that their trance states differ from their normal alert states, and assess and measure their subjective perception of alertness before and after hypnosis. Furthermore, regular use of the HAS holds potential to enhance both the therapeutic alliance and the patient's sense of safety and mastery. The development and use of the HAS is discussed along with three vignettes illustrating its clinical application.

Arrhythmia conversion to sinus rhythm during a hypnosis: Is hypnosis a normal bystander or a guilty accomplice?

“…When performed by competent practitioners, adverse reactions in hypnosis are rare, minor (e.g. emergence of strong affects, like anxiety and headaches) and reversible [25] . We therefore believe that hypnosis is a safe tool that could be easily offered to all willing patients.…”

First, keep it safe: Integration of a complementary medicine service within a hospital

“…For instance, due to extreme emotional stress, patients may have a lower threshold for abreactions during mind-body therapies such as hypnosis and guided imagery. 18 Touch therapies may be challenging in patients following surgery because of the mobilisation of painful organs. Dietary supplements and herbs have a greater potential for adverse effects and interactions with medications or procedures.…”

“…Under these circumstances, the potential for safety‐related incidents is extremely high. For instance, due to extreme emotional stress, patients may have a lower threshold for abreactions during mind‐body therapies such as hypnosis and guided imagery . Touch therapies may be challenging in patients following surgery because of the mobilisation of painful organs.…”