1993
DOI: 10.1002/art.1790060306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting self‐care in clients with arthritis

Abstract: Preliminary work regarding the development and pilot study of an individualized instructionalprogram for rheumatoid arthritis clients is presented. The effect of the individualized instructional program was tested with 31 outpatients. Using analysis of covariance, the experimental group subjectsscored significantly higher on the knowledge post‐test when compared to scores of control group subjects (P = 0.0045). Analysis of variance for repeated measures revealed no significant difference in performance of task… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hammond et al (40) reported significant improvement in functional ability. This finding was supported by Neuberger et al (24), who reported significant improvement in their CCT. Four studies (19,24,40,48) measured pain.…”
Section: Steultjens Et Alsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Hammond et al (40) reported significant improvement in functional ability. This finding was supported by Neuberger et al (24), who reported significant improvement in their CCT. Four studies (19,24,40,48) measured pain.…”
Section: Steultjens Et Alsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This finding was supported by Neuberger et al (24), who reported significant improvement in their CCT. Four studies (19,24,40,48) measured pain. Hammond et al (40) reported no significant differences between groups.…”
Section: Steultjens Et Alsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, since all outcomes were measured using self-report questionnaires that vary in their respective sensitivities to change, the relationship between statistical and clinical significance should be examined on a case-by-case basis. Furthermore, when examining these results, it should be noted that several studies yielded negative effect sizes for various outcomes, indicating that psychological treatments are not beneficial for all patients or for all outcomes (8,31,36,38,42,51).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%