2016
DOI: 10.20429/ger.2016.130202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting Student Buy-in: Using Writing to Develop Mathematical Understanding

Abstract: , B. (2004). The effects of schoolbased writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a writing rubric using the criteria ideas, organization, word choice, sentence fluency, conventions, and voice (Bradford et al, 2016) communicates to students these attributes of effective writing. Or, a mathematical justification rubric using the criteria mathematical language, mathematical steps, mathematical reasoning, and solution in context (King et al, 2016) communicates to students these attributes of effective mathematical justification. In both cases, the criteria are exactly what the students are trying to learn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, a writing rubric using the criteria ideas, organization, word choice, sentence fluency, conventions, and voice (Bradford et al, 2016) communicates to students these attributes of effective writing. Or, a mathematical justification rubric using the criteria mathematical language, mathematical steps, mathematical reasoning, and solution in context (King et al, 2016) communicates to students these attributes of effective mathematical justification. In both cases, the criteria are exactly what the students are trying to learn.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section, therefore, does not focus on the point that rubrics studies, the rubrics were used formatively. Ten of those studies explicitly described formative uses: as a framework for instruction (Bradford et al, 2016); as the basis of individual and group activities (Auxtero & Callaman, 2021); and/or as the basis of feedback from teacher, peer, or self (Chen & Andrade, 2018;Chen et al, 2017;Hsia et al, 2016;Kim, 2019;King et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2016;Safadi, 2017;Safadi & Saadi, 2021). One study (Mahmood & Jacobo, 2019) focused on the use of sliding scale rubrics for grading, but the students used the rubrics formatively as they were preparing mathematics portfolios to submit for grading; in other words, they self-assessed as they prepared their portfolios.…”
Section: Effects Of Rubrics On Learning and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of the code of inconsistencies among different explanations made on the same topic and between explanations and mathematical operations, which was examined under the theme titled -features of the explanations‖, it can be stated that writing activities had a positive impact on students with an achievement level of C or D. In other words, it can be claimed that writing activities enabled students at these levels of achievement to reflect on what they have written and internalize their explanations in the course of time (King, Raposo & Gimenez, 2016;Pugalee, 2001;Seto & Meel, 2006) because in the beginning, students produce superficial responses, but at a later point in time, they write responses by establishing a connection between the question and mathematical knowledge. Phillis (2020) stated that it would not be easy for students to produce writings relevant to a topic that they could not understand, but that writing could help students to organize their ideas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samuelsson (2010) supports this as the use of teaching methods in which students use their language for discussion in solving mathematical problems positively affects students' conceptual understanding. King et al (2016) (1991) refers to the importance of representations, connectivity, and mobility among them, within the fourth standard of professional development standards for mathematics teachers, which is "pedagogical knowledge of mathematical content" by saying: that the modeling of mathematical ideas through various representations (sensory, visual, graphics, symbols, and others) is an essential move in learning mathematics. Regarding that, the mathematics teacher needs a rich and deep knowledge in the various methods of modeling different concepts, procedures and ideas in mathematics, in addition to the ability to navigate between these representations because it helps students understand mathematics and be able to build it themselves, and therefore the ability to choose, modify and build representations is at the core of mathematics pedagogy.…”
Section: / 19mentioning
confidence: 99%