Promoting the development of graduate students of color

Cheatham, Harold E.; Phelps, Christine E.

doi:10.1002/ss.37119957212

Cited by 16 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous research indicates that increasing numbers of faculty members of color may contribute to the “critical mass” needed to have a positive impact on educational quality and student achievement (Blackwell, 1981; Cheatham & Phelps, 1995; Reyes & Halcon, 1991). Further research on the impact of mentoring programs supports the notion that faculty diversity has a positive effect on retaining students of color.…”

Section: Faculty Diversity In Community Collegesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hiring Diverse Faculty Members in Community Colleges

Fujimoto

2012

Community College Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Faculty Diversity In Community Collegesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hiring Diverse Faculty Members in Community Colleges

Fujimoto

2012

Community College Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This threatens their success because research has shown that students seek out mentors that look like them for formal and informal mentoring (Frierson, Hargrove, and Lewis 1994). Further, research has also shown that students are more likely to succeed academically when they are surrounded by same race and gender role models (Armstrong and Thompson 2003;Cheatham and Phelps 1995). The fact that less than one percent of all doctoral faculty in STEM are Black (Dillon et al 2015;National Science Foundation 2015) makes this reality nearly impossible for many Black female Ph.D. students.…”

Section: Social Comparison and Sense Of Belonging In Stem 757mentioning

confidence: 99%

“La Crème de la Crème”: How Racial, Gendered, and Intersectional Social Comparisons Reveal Inequities That Affect Sense of Belonging in STEM

Brockman

2021

Sociological Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper analyses the social-psychological processes of social comparison and relative deprivation with regard to race, gender, and their intersections in STEM higher education through the narratives of 33 Black respondents who described their experiences within engineering and computer science doctoral programs. I use social comparison and relative deprivation, a subsidiary theory of social comparison, as guiding theoretical frameworks. Since the intersections of race and gender are salient, I also incorporate an intersectional framework as an analytical tool. Through data derived from semi-structured interviews, I find that, when describing graduate-school experiences, Black engineering and computer science respondents use social comparisons with regard to race, gender, and their intersections to juxtapose their experiences with those of their peers. Participants described feeling relatively deprived due to inequities resulting from racism and/or sexism and primarily felt that STEM privileged students that were Asian men. Nevertheless, Black men described downward social comparisons with their Black female counterparts, recognizing the sexist culture of STEM. Overall, however, social comparison processes led Black respondents to identify inequities within their Ph.D. programs in engineering and computer science that made them feel as though STEM was not intended for them, but, rather, for their Asian and white male peers who are positioned as belonging.

show abstract

“…They also represent a tangible example of achievement and possibilities for Black students (Perna et al , 2009). Although not entirely the job of Black faculty, Black students do better in the classroom when they are presented with same-race role models because there is a greater sense of cultural and historical familiarity (Armstrong and Thompson, 2003; Cheatham and Phelps, 1995). By recruiting and retaining Black faculty in the STEM fields, institutions of higher education may bolster the confidence and, ultimately, the success of Black students in these fields.…”

Section: The Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Engaging voices

Gasman

Nguyen

2016

JME

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to discuss the methods that were used to do egalitarian research with ten Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs). Rather than doing research “on” these institutions, the authors worked with them to understand their successes and build upon their capacity in the science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) areas. Through this process, the authors aimed to bring exposure and interest to the practices that HBCUs use to increase and nurture success in African American students – practices that are rarely used in mainstream STEM programs and, in fact, run counter to well-established practices across STEM. The goal is to challenge traditional methods for pursuing STEM education research as the authors offer alternative methods the uplift and empower HBCUs. Design/methodology/approach The authors used the constant comparative method in developing, testing, and writing-up the HBCU success stories. The constant comparative method collects data in a systematic way by engaging in ongoing exploration and verification of findings with key stakeholders (in this case, the teachers, students and staff at the HBCUs). Across the ten HBCUs in the sample, at least one success story or model at each institution was identified; in some instances, there were more. Findings The research project had several implications for the social and economic health of society. First, supporting the work of HBCUs contributes to the diversification of the STEM fields and addresses the severe drought in the STEM workforce. It is without doubt that a diverse workforce – the unique perspectives and backgrounds of each individual – has a positive and significant influence on progress and innovation in any field. Despite increasingly growing minority communities across the country, many Blacks continue to face roadblocks that impede their opportunities and abilities in the K-20 pipeline and STEM education, specifically. Because HBCUs have a long history and record of tearing down those roadblocks and contributing Black students to the STEM workforce, they are prime and optimal sites for long-term investment. Second, improving the abilities of HBCUs to support student success in STEM also increases the likelihood of greater STEM minority teachers and faculty. A significant factor in the success of minority students in STEM is the opportunity to be taught and mentored by faculty members that look like them and/or deeply understand their personal background and struggles. For many Black students, the presence of a Black science professor can improve and retain student interest and aspiration in STEM. But with so few Black STEM faculty members, many students can easily fall through the cracks. Third, aside from the nation’s security and health, supporting HBCUs’ work in STEM student achievement represents immeasurable benefits for the individual and his/her family for many generations to come (i.e. society overall). Occupations in STEM are plentiful and fruitful for those who achieve the required credentials. Increasing opportunities for Black students to pursue these STEM careers can establish a path toward upward social mobility. The realization of these benefits is contingent upon the investment in early achievement in STEM courses. Research limitations/implications Several research based outcomes are scheduled to result from this project, including a major policy report on HBCUs and their approaches to STEM education (co-constructed with the HBCU representatives); several peer reviewed articles (authored by us as well as the HBCU representatives); a national convening (showcasing both the best practices and the results of the HBCUs’ funded capacity building projects with the HBCU representatives as the primary speakers rather than us); a website featuring the work of the 10 HBCUs, active use of social media to disseminate the findings of the project; several op-eds written for a general audience and co-authored with HBCU representatives; and an authored book published by a university press. Practical implications Best practices gleaned from this project are being shared in a scholarly manner, but they will be shared in ways that are accessible to practitioners, including presidents, faculty, academic advisors, student success staff and other HBCU practitioners. In addition, best practices will be shared with majority colleges and universities to strengthen and improve practices more broadly in STEM. The authors are working with organizations such as the Association of American Universities, Association of Public Land Grant Universities and the American Association of Colleges and Universities to showcase the work of HBCUs and disseminate information. Social implications Conducting research projects in which the research inquiry is co-constructed and the resulting research products are also co-constructed and even co-authored is an empowering and collaborative way to work across institutional types. More importantly, this approach brings attention to those researchers and teachers at HBCUs that are doing the day-to-day work with students, training them to be scientists, doctors and professors. Too often, only those conducting studies on STEM are credited with “discovering” success models for student learning. The authors think that those who have created these models and use them should be recognized and included in the research and dissemination process, and the authors encourage others to think more broadly and openly about collaborative research that engages the voices of HBCU researchers and students. Originality/value This project also has much to teach others about collaborating through research. First, collaborating when conducting research related to STEM is essential, as it encourages collaboration within STEM and among STEM researchers. HBCU researchers that were a part of our project – biologists, physicist and chemists – were encouraged to work across disciplinary lines and together to understand their own STEM education practices more fully.

show abstract

Promoting the development of graduate students of color

Abstract: Multicultural coursework, pedagogy, and support services that honor diverse needs and voices can enhance the environment for graduate students of color.

Cited by 16 publications

References 10 publications

Hiring Diverse Faculty Members in Community Colleges

Hiring Diverse Faculty Members in Community Colleges

“La Crème de la Crème”: How Racial, Gendered, and Intersectional Social Comparisons Reveal Inequities That Affect Sense of Belonging in STEM

Engaging voices

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About