2023
DOI: 10.3390/polym15041052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promotion of In Vitro Osteogenic Activity by Melt Extrusion-Based PLLA/PCL/PHBV Scaffolds Enriched with Nano-Hydroxyapatite and Strontium Substituted Nano-Hydroxyapatite

Abstract: Bone tissue engineering has emerged as a promising strategy to overcome the limitations of current treatments for bone-related disorders, but the trade-off between mechanical properties and bioactivity remains a concern for many polymeric materials. To address this need, novel polymeric blends of poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), polycaprolactone (PCL) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) have been explored. Blend filaments comprising PLLA/PCL/PHBV at a ratio of 90/5/5 wt% have been prepared using … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the wide range of processable materials, low material and use cost, environmental protection, and nontoxicity, fused deposition modeling (FDM), as the most common 3D printing technology, offers the potential for design and manufacturing in the combination of polymers and the biomedical field [ 32 , 33 ]. Furthermore, FDM has shown obvious competitiveness in the preparation of biodegradable polymer bone scaffolds including PLA [ 34 , 35 , 36 ]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are few studies currently available on PLA/Mg(OH) 2 porous bone scaffolds, let alone those using FDM 3D printing technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the wide range of processable materials, low material and use cost, environmental protection, and nontoxicity, fused deposition modeling (FDM), as the most common 3D printing technology, offers the potential for design and manufacturing in the combination of polymers and the biomedical field [ 32 , 33 ]. Furthermore, FDM has shown obvious competitiveness in the preparation of biodegradable polymer bone scaffolds including PLA [ 34 , 35 , 36 ]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are few studies currently available on PLA/Mg(OH) 2 porous bone scaffolds, let alone those using FDM 3D printing technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past few decades have witnessed the rapid development of scaffolds for BTE, owing to the increasing abundance of biomaterials and continuous emergence of new fabrication techniques [10,12]. Different categories of biomaterials have been explored to construct BTE scaffolds for cranial bone regeneration including metals, ceramics, polymers, hydrogels, and composites, among which bioactive composites have demonstrated enhanced bone repairing capabilities as they combine the advantages of individual groups of materials, providing greater flexibility in tuning the biological, mechanical, and structural properties of the engineered scaffolds [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. For example, Kim et al have developed a multifunctional hybrid scaffold by immobilizing a bioactive nanocomplex (NC) composed of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) and polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) on a preformed scaffold (PME) comprising poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA), ricinoleic acid modified magnesium hydroxide (mMH), and bone extracellular matrix (bECM) [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, nanoHA holds great promise for various applications, particularly in the treatment of bone defects such as those derived from osteoporotic pathologies, a significant global health concern characterized by brittle bones [ 8 ], leading to decreased bone mass, increased fracture risk, and reduced bone strength. In this context, bone fractures can be treated either by filling them with medical devices enriched with nanoHA, such as bioactive bone cements and osteogenic injectable hydrogels and microspheres [ 9 ] containing nanoHA, polymeric composite matrices such as 3D osteogenic scaffolds [ 10 ], or coatings of metallic implants with nanoHA compounds [ 11 , 12 ]. The use of minimally and noninvasive therapeutic agents for bone tumor ablation and bone regeneration as bifunctional materials is another recently reported challenge [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%