1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2991(98)80402-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promotion of Steam Reforming Catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant effort continues to examine alternative reactor conditions [114,115], catalysts [116,117], and membrane reactor designs [118], as well as H 2 sources [103,104], so variations to H 2 −separating conditions and, therefore, to membrane material performance requirements, are likely to continue into the future [108].…”
Section: Application Regimes Of Proton Conductors For H 2 Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant effort continues to examine alternative reactor conditions [114,115], catalysts [116,117], and membrane reactor designs [118], as well as H 2 sources [103,104], so variations to H 2 −separating conditions and, therefore, to membrane material performance requirements, are likely to continue into the future [108].…”
Section: Application Regimes Of Proton Conductors For H 2 Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, under hydrocarbon steam reforming reaction conditions, Ni catalyst surface may have an important coverage of OH radicals and O atoms, instead of water molecules. Moreover, the investigation of steam adsorption mechanism on various supported Ni-based catalyst, has shown that magnesia support is active for steam dissociation and that its spillover probably involves OH species instead of molecular water [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volumes of synthesis gases were estimated by the equilibrium calculation of steam reforming and water-gas shift reactions at 850 8C and 2.0 MPa G. At the point of nearby feed molar ratio of CH 4 :CO 2 :H 2 O = 1.0:0.4:1.0, the feed gas volume is minimized and it is predicted that preferable operations with lower energy consumption can be accomplished. But in the case of CO 2 and H 2 O reforming with conventional reforming catalysts, the selection of these operating conditions is prohibited by higher potential for carbon formation, and particular technologies for suppress of carbon deposition will be required [5][6][7][8][9][11][12][13]20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the dry reforming conditions, especially at high pressure, the product synthesis gases have high thermodynamic potential for carbon formation. Nielsen et al defined the carbon activity as the indication of carbon formation possibility [5][6][7]. If this value exceeds to 1.0, carbon will deposit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%