Promotion, prevention and protection: interventions at the population- and community-levels for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries

Petersen, Inge; Evans‐Lacko, Sara; Semrau, Maya; Barry, Margaret M.; Chisholm, Dan; Gronholm, Petra C.; Egbe, Catherine O.; Thornicroft, Graham

doi:10.1186/s13033-016-0060-z

Cited by 75 publications

(70 citation statements)

References 120 publications

(109 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also increasing awareness of chronic conditions via school-based programmes is considered a "good practice" strategy in LMICs. 316 Another system level approach would involve augmenting the competences of the existing work staff at all levels of care. Although education about the link between chronic physical and mental health conditions is an important tool to support changes in clinical practice, it is rarely a one-off solution to altering knowledge and behaviours.…”

Section: Innovations In Integration For Low-and Middle Income Countrimentioning

confidence: 99%

The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: a blueprint for protecting physical health in people with mental illness

Firth

Siddiqi

Koyanagi

et al. 2019

The Lancet Psychiatry

Self Cite

1,037

1,093

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Executive SummaryThe poor physical health of people with mental illness is a multi-faceted, transdiagnostic, and global problem. Physical health disparities are observed across the entire spectrum of mental illnesses, in low, middle-and high-income countries. This stems from both a heightened risk of physical diseases in people with mental illness, along with their reduced access to adequate healthcare. The high rates of physical comorbidities (and typically-poor clinical management of this) drastically reduces life expectancy, and also increases the personal, social and economic burden of illness across the lifespan.This Commission has brought together an international team of researchers, clinicians, and key stakeholders from various backgrounds and professionally / personally-relevant experience, in order to summarize advances in understanding on this topic, and present clear directions for health promotion, clinical care and future research. The breadth and multifactorial nature of physical health disparities across the range of mental health diagnoses poses an almost limitless number of potential considerations. Therefore, rather than attempting to cover all of the different possible combinations of physical-mental comorbidities individually, the aim of this Commission was to: (i) establish highlypertinent aspects of physical health-related morbidity and mortality which apply transdiagnostically, (ii) highlight the common modifiable factors driving these disparities, (iii) present actions and initiatives for health policy and clinical services to address these issues, and (iv) identify promising areas for future research towards discovering novel solutions. This was addressed across 5 different Parts of the Commission: Parts 1 and 2 determined the scope, priorities and key targets for physical health improvement across multiple mental illnesses. Parts 3, 4 and 5 discussed emerging strategies and produced recommendations for improving physical health outcomes in people with mental illness. Leaders and contributors for each Part are shown in the Appendix (pg.1) . Part 1: 'Its more than premature mortality'Part 1 identified almost 100 systematic reviews/meta-analyses examining the prevalence of physical comorbidities in mental illness. Around 70% of the meta-research focused on cardiometabolic diseases; consistently reporting that mental illnesses were associated with 1.4-to 2-fold increased risk for obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases compared to the general population. Although mostly studied in 'severe mental illness' ('SMI', and particularly psychotic disorders), the prevalence of cardiometabolic diseases was similarly elevated across a broad range of other diagnoses, including substance use disorders (SUDs), and 'common mental disorders' ('CMDs', such as depression and anxiety). Part 2: Key modifiable factors in health behaviours and health servicesPart 2 built on the findings of Part 1 with a hierarchal evidence synthesis of modifiable risk factors for physical diseases in mental illness. The bu...

show abstract

Section: Innovations In Integration For Low-and Middle Income Countrimentioning

confidence: 99%

The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: a blueprint for protecting physical health in people with mental illness

Firth

Siddiqi

Koyanagi

et al. 2019

The Lancet Psychiatry

Self Cite

1,037

1,093

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The bases for these wider types of intervention are sometimes called “platforms”, and two are particularly relevant here: population‐level and community‐level platforms. Examples of the former include legislation, regulations, and public information campaigns, and examples of the latter include schools, workplaces, and neighborhoods/community groups. A recent review, based upon the best available evidence from low‐ and middle‐income settings, has shown which such interventions are most cost‐effective.…”

Section: Community Services Provided Across Wider Platforms Of Carementioning

confidence: 99%

Community mental health care worldwide: current status and further developments

2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to give an overview of the key issues facing those who are in a position to influence the planning and provision of mental health systems, and who need to address questions of which staff, services and sectors to invest in, and for which patients. The paper considers in turn: a) definitions of community mental health care; b) a conceptual framework to use when evaluating the need for hospital and community mental health care; c) the potential for wider platforms, outside the health service, for mental health improvement, including schools and the workplace; d) data on how far community mental health services have been developed across different regions of the world; e) the need to develop in more detail models of community mental health services for low-and middle-income countries which are directly based upon evidence for those countries; f) how to incorporate mental health practice within integrated models to identify and treat people with comorbid long-term conditions; g) possible adverse effects of deinstitutionalization. We then present a series of ten recommendations for the future strengthening of health systems to support and treat people with mental illness.

show abstract

“…Trials conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have demonstrated the efficacy and effectiveness of both psycho-pharmacological treatment and evidence-based psychotherapies for treating mental disorders [6–13]. Furthermore, studies on the cost-effectiveness of mental health treatments increasingly highlight the economic value of preventing and treating mental disorders in these settings [14••, 15]. …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Challenges and Opportunities in Global Mental Health: a Research-to-Practice Perspective

Wainberg

Scorza

Shultz

et al. 2017

Curr Psychiatry Rep

510

290

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of Review Globally, the majority of those who need mental health care worldwide lack access to high-quality mental health services. Stigma, human resource shortages, fragmented service delivery models, and lack of research capacity for implementation and policy change contribute to the current mental health treatment gap. In this review, we describe how health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are addressing the mental health gap and further identify challenges and priority areas for future research. Recent Findings Common mental disorders are responsible for the largest proportion of the global burden of disease; yet, there is sound evidence that these disorders, as well as severe mental disorders, can be successfully treated using evidence-based interventions delivered by trained lay health workers in low-resource community or primary care settings. Stigma is a barrier to service uptake. Prevention, though necessary to address the mental health gap, has not solidified as a research or programmatic focus. Research-to-practice implementation studies are required to inform policies and scale-up services. Summary Four priority areas are identified for focused attention to diminish the mental health treatment gap and to improve access to high-quality mental health services globally: diminishing pervasive stigma, building mental health system treatment and research capacity, implementing prevention programs to decrease the incidence of mental disorders, and establishing sustainable scale up of public health systems to improve access to mental health treatment using evidence-based interventions.

show abstract

Promotion, prevention and protection: interventions at the population- and community-levels for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in low- and middle-income countries

Cited by 75 publications

References 120 publications

The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: a blueprint for protecting physical health in people with mental illness

The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: a blueprint for protecting physical health in people with mental illness

Community mental health care worldwide: current status and further developments

Challenges and Opportunities in Global Mental Health: a Research-to-Practice Perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About