2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2004.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promotions and product pricing: Parsimony versus Veblenesque demand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study is related to the work in social factors and conspicuous consumption [15,20,21]. Focusing on the conspicuous products, Krähmer [15] indicates that brands are consumed for image reasons and advertising creates a brand's image.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our study is related to the work in social factors and conspicuous consumption [15,20,21]. Focusing on the conspicuous products, Krähmer [15] indicates that brands are consumed for image reasons and advertising creates a brand's image.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, he finds that an incumbent might strategically overinvest in advertising to deter entry, and competition might be socially undesirable. McClure and Kumcu [20] formalize the relationship between the optimal price/quantity combination and the thoroughness of conspicuous product promotions. They reveal that iterating towards the profit maximizing thoroughness of product promotion will lead to a backward bending price/quantity locus.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Marshall seemed to feel that this would make the diagrammatical treatment too complex. Recently, Reder and Samuelson noticed that external economies and diseconomies of consumption may vitiate (or, at best, greatly complicate) their “new” welfare analysis, and hence, in true academic fashion, they assume the problem away.’ See also McClure and Kumcu [] deriving an upward sloping demand‐like curve when consumers’ utility depends on the level of quality chosen by the firm. Similarly, see Rohlfs [] deriving an upward sloping demand curve for network effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%