Prompt muon contribution to the flux underwater

Abstract

We present high energy spectra and zenith-angle distributions of the atmospheric muons computed for the depths of the locations of the underwater neutrino telescopes. We compare the calculations with the data obtained in the Baikal and the AMANDA muon experiments. The prompt muon contribution to the muon flux underwater due to recent perturbative QCD-based models of the charm production is expected to be observable at depths of the large underwater neutrino telescopes. This appears to be probable even at rather shallow depths (1-2 km), provided that the energy threshold for muon detection is raised above $\sim 100$ TeV.Comment: 7 pages, RevTeX, 7 eps figures, final version to be published in Phys.Rev.D; a few changes made in the text and the figures, an approximation formula for muon spectra at the sea level, the muon zenith-angle distribution table data and references adde

Describing the observed cosmic neutrinos by interactions of nuclei with matter

“…We therefore extrapolate it from the muon neutrino background, which is roughly consistent with the flavor composition in Ref. [34]. We obtain 3.6 background muon tracks from neutrinos, 3.2 cascades from neutrinos, and 8.6 muon tracks from atmospheric muons, matching the publicly available information on the IceCube analysis.…”

Measuring the prompt atmospheric neutrino flux with down-going muons in neutrino telescopes

“…Here again we are suggesting to use down-going prompt muons, at energies E µ > ∼ 1 TeV where prompt muons can be separated from conventional ones [17], this time to measure the flux of prompt electron and muon atmospheric neutrinos at sea level. We find that the ratio of prompt neutrino to prompt muon fluxes is about 1.1, constant with energy to within 10%, and almost independent of the choice of PDF and charm production parameters.…”

Probing very high energy prompt muon and neutrino fluxes and the cosmic ray knee via underground muons

“…Methods to enable this have been studied, and are based on the differences in zenith angle, depth and spectral dependance between these fluxes [42,43] and on the isolating capability of showering ν e charged current events via a break in the spectrum [44].…”