Proof General meets IsaWin

Aspinall, David; Lüth, Christoph

doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2004.09.011

Cited by 7 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The broker architecture, with an Emacs-based and an Eclipse-based display, has been developed and is available as a prototype [3,4]. The authoring extensions have been added to this prototype and support from provers (in particular, Isabelle) is anticipated in future development versions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…text-based ones) are free to ignore configurations which only make sense for graphical displays. The only adjustment needed here over the description in [3] is to allow improper commands as well as proper ones. Note how only the prover needs knowledge about the logical structure of the proof, the types involved and so on; from the broker's and displays' point of view, the protocol is completely generic.…”

Section: Script Backflowmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…PG Kit is instead based on a uniform mechanism, specifying the syntax of messages exchanged between components and the protocol governing message exchanges. This section introduces just what is needed; full details are elsewhere [2][3][4].…”

Section: Pgip and The Pg Kit Architecturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Each display may implement a different interaction paradigm: a text editor (e.g., Emacs) based on textual input and cryptic key sequences; a GUI (e.g., PGWin [3]) using graphical techniques such as drag-and-drop and point-and-click to construct proofs, or a generic IDE (e.g., Eclipse [26]) with sophisticated navigation and project management, using both graphical and textual interaction.…”

Section: Graphical Usermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Assisted Proof Document Authoring

Aspinall

Lüth

Wolff

2006

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Recently, significant advances have been made in formalised mathematical texts for large, demanding proofs. But although such large developments are possible, they still take an inordinate amount of effort and time, and there is a significant gap between the resulting formalised machine-checkable proof scripts and the corresponding human-readable mathematical texts. We present an authoring system for formal proof which addresses these concerns. It is based on a central document format which, in the tradition of literate programming, allows one to extract either a formal proof script or a human-readable document; the two may have differing structure and detail levels, but are developed together in a synchronised way. Additionally, we introduce ways to assist production of the central document, by allowing tools to contribute backflow to update and extend it. Our authoring system builds on the new PG Kit architecture for Proof General, bringing the extra advantage that it works in a uniform interface, generically across various interactive theorem provers.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Script Backflowmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Pgip and The Pg Kit Architecturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Graphical Usermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Assisted Proof Document Authoring

Aspinall

Lüth

Wolff

2006

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It arose by examining and clarifying the communications used in the existing Proof General system. As we developed prototype systems following the ideas outlined above, the protocol has been revised and extended to encompass graphical front-ends, a document model markup for proof scripts, and authoring extensions [3,4,5]. PGIP is an abstraction of the communication between provers and interfaces.…”

Section: A Protocol For Interactive Proofmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Framework for Interactive Proof

Aspinall

Lüth²,

Winterstein

Towards Mechanized Mathematical Assistants

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. This paper introduces Proof General Kit, a framework for software components tailored to interactive proof development. The goal of the framework is to enable flexible environments for managing formal proofs across their life-cycle: creation, maintenance and exploitation. The framework connects together different kinds of component, exchanging messages using a common communication infrastructure and protocol called PGIP. The main channel connects provers to displays. Provers are the back-end interactive proof engines and displays are components for interacting with the user, allowing browsing or editing of proofs. At the core of the framework is a broker middleware component which manages proof-in-progress and mediates between components.

show abstract

Adding a graphical output to a theorem prover: Results of a comparison of the acceptance from a teaching point of view

Maestro

Simon-Hurtado

2015

Comp Applic In Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article describes the experience and results obtained from teaching computational logic in an introductory course for undergraduates. The proposed teaching approach helps students to reach a deeper level of understanding in first order logic representation, computational logic procedures and automated theorem proving. The article includes the description of SLI, a theorem prover with a graphical output and the results of a survey to assess the acceptance of the tool. ß 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Comput Appl Eng Educ 23:837-845, 2015; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/cae; DOI 10.1002/cae.21654

show abstract

Proof General meets IsaWin

Cited by 7 publications

References 21 publications

Assisted Proof Document Authoring

Assisted Proof Document Authoring

A Framework for Interactive Proof

Adding a graphical output to a theorem prover: Results of a comparison of the acceptance from a teaching point of view

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About