2016
DOI: 10.3390/app6020033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proof of Concept of Crack Localization Using Negative Pressure Waves in Closed Tubes for Later Application in Effective SHM System for Additive Manufactured Components

Abstract: Additive manufactured components have a different metallurgic structure and are more prone to fatigue cracks than conventionally produced metals. In earlier papers, an effective Structural Health Monitoring solution was presented to detect fatigue cracks in additive manufactured components. Small subsurface capillaries are embedded in the structure and pressurized (vacuum or overpressure). A crack that initiated at the component's surface will propagate towards the capillary and finally breach it. One capillar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The change in wave velocity observed in the 15D d -length region around the leak would complicate the localization system if one of the sensors were located too close to the leak location. This is a plausible explanation for the remaining localization error in the experiments of Hinderdael et al [10] since they assumed constant propagation speeds in small length ducts. Therefore, both sensors should be placed far enough from the critical fatigue zone where cracks can occur or the localization method should be adapted taking into account the non-constant velocity evolution of the wave in order to be applicable in any situation.…”
Section: Results: Shock Wave Propagation Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The change in wave velocity observed in the 15D d -length region around the leak would complicate the localization system if one of the sensors were located too close to the leak location. This is a plausible explanation for the remaining localization error in the experiments of Hinderdael et al [10] since they assumed constant propagation speeds in small length ducts. Therefore, both sensors should be placed far enough from the critical fatigue zone where cracks can occur or the localization method should be adapted taking into account the non-constant velocity evolution of the wave in order to be applicable in any situation.…”
Section: Results: Shock Wave Propagation Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Previous experiments described in [10,11] were performed on short ducts of around L = 0.5 m. In this work, longer ducts of L = 3 m are considered. In this way, a deeper understanding of the propagation behavior of the wave can be obtained.…”
Section: Objectives and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hinderdael et al [17] presented a crack localization principle based on the time-of-flight difference of pressure waves propagating in the fluid media inside the integrated capillaries. This principle was further researched [18,19] but to date no successful crack localization has been achieved during an actual fatigue crack event.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%