1988
DOI: 10.1016/0168-0072(88)90055-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proof-theoretical analysis: weak systems of functions and classes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore [11] posed a deeper problem conjecturing that intuitionistic set theories under consideration are conservative extensions of the underlying arithmetical intuitionistic formalisms. These conjectures (et al) have been confirmed [14] for Friedman's extensional set theories T 1 , T 2 , T 3 having proof-theoretic strengths |T 1 | = ε 0 , |T 2 | = ϕ ε 0 (0), |T 3 | = ϕ ε Ω+1 (0) (also known as Howard ordinal |ID 1 |). Moreover [14] strengthened Friedman's conjectures by also proving conservations in the presence of consistent combinations of other constructive principles like an anti-foundation axiom Cpl and/or finite-types axiom of choice AC ft [14,Corollary 3,p.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore [11] posed a deeper problem conjecturing that intuitionistic set theories under consideration are conservative extensions of the underlying arithmetical intuitionistic formalisms. These conjectures (et al) have been confirmed [14] for Friedman's extensional set theories T 1 , T 2 , T 3 having proof-theoretic strengths |T 1 | = ε 0 , |T 2 | = ϕ ε 0 (0), |T 3 | = ϕ ε Ω+1 (0) (also known as Howard ordinal |ID 1 |). Moreover [14] strengthened Friedman's conjectures by also proving conservations in the presence of consistent combinations of other constructive principles like an anti-foundation axiom Cpl and/or finite-types axiom of choice AC ft [14,Corollary 3,p.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Bisimulation + realizability translation [13,14] of a given set theory T (here Basic (i) + Ext + Δ 0 -Sep + Θ (+SC) + (either Fnd or SClps)) into appropriate Feferman-style applicative intensional intuitionistic theory of functions and classes (call it T app ). 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Beeson showed how this can be understood as the composition of forcing and realizability and extended Goodman's theorem to the extensional setting (see [2] and also [3]). Other proofs have been given by Gordeev [9], Mints [18], Coquand [4] and Renardel de Lavalette [21]; the authors of this paper are unsure whether this list is complete. (An interesting observation, due to Kohlenbach, is that Goodman's Theorem can fail badly for fragments: see [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%