2018
DOI: 10.1111/twec.12725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propagation of changes in demand through international trade: A case study of China

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accounting for the direct as well as rebounding second‐round trade effects, Andritzky et al. (2019) show in an input‐output framework that a final demand shock occurring in China does less harm to the global economy than shocks originating in the EU or the United States because of the latter two's comparatively larger share of imports of final goods. Unsurprisingly, with close trade ties in mind, a Chinese final demand shock generally affects the output of its Asian neighbours strongest in negative terms, outpacing economic turmoil caused in Europe and the United States.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accounting for the direct as well as rebounding second‐round trade effects, Andritzky et al. (2019) show in an input‐output framework that a final demand shock occurring in China does less harm to the global economy than shocks originating in the EU or the United States because of the latter two's comparatively larger share of imports of final goods. Unsurprisingly, with close trade ties in mind, a Chinese final demand shock generally affects the output of its Asian neighbours strongest in negative terms, outpacing economic turmoil caused in Europe and the United States.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The China Report on the Work of the Government 2023 reports that the gross domestic product (GDP) increased to 121 trillion yuan in 2022, with an average annual growth rate of 5.2% in five years. According to the World Bank, China has become the second-largest economy in the world since 2010 [ 4 ]. As Linnenluecke et al (2020) [ 5 ]note, topics related to China have received considerable attention in the practical field and in the academic community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…China Report on the Work of the Government 2020 reports that gross domestic product reached 99.1 trillion yuan in the year of 2019, representing a 6.1 percent increase over the previous year. According to World Bank, China has become the second largest economy in the world since 2010 (Andritzky et al ., 2019). Not only being notable in the practice world, China‐related topics is bursting in academic world (Linnenluecke et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%