2020
DOI: 10.5075/epfl-thesis-7470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propagation of fluid driven fractures in transversely isotropic material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a partial loss of transmitted pressure due to the contact conditions between the flat jacks, spacers, and specimen surfaces (due to friction). Finite element simulations of the overall geometry (accounting for the platens transmitting the pressure and the finite specimen) have shown that for a hydrostatic loading condition σ 1 = σ 2 = σ 3 = 20 MPa, a stress attenuation of around 15% (σ 3 ≈ 17 MPa) in an area around 60 mm is reported in the center plane of the sample (Moukhtari, 2020). Taking directly the flat jack pressures, we thus use an upper bound for σ 3 here, such that the reported apparent toughness is probably underestimated.…”
Section: Apparent Fracture Toughness From P(t) and R S (T)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a partial loss of transmitted pressure due to the contact conditions between the flat jacks, spacers, and specimen surfaces (due to friction). Finite element simulations of the overall geometry (accounting for the platens transmitting the pressure and the finite specimen) have shown that for a hydrostatic loading condition σ 1 = σ 2 = σ 3 = 20 MPa, a stress attenuation of around 15% (σ 3 ≈ 17 MPa) in an area around 60 mm is reported in the center plane of the sample (Moukhtari, 2020). Taking directly the flat jack pressures, we thus use an upper bound for σ 3 here, such that the reported apparent toughness is probably underestimated.…”
Section: Apparent Fracture Toughness From P(t) and R S (T)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundaries of the specimen likely have a stronger influence on the volume estimated via Equation A2 (and thus underestimate fracture volume in the presence of finite boundaries). In addition, the applied minimum stress σ 3 is also lower closer to the boundary due to the geometry of the loading system (Moukhtari, 2020). As a result, the estimated fracture volume when the fracture front comes close to the specimen boundary is likely severely underestimated for GABB-005 as shown in Figure 5.…”
Section: Estimated Fracture Volume (From P(t) and R S (T)) Versus Ent...mentioning
confidence: 99%