2013
DOI: 10.1541/ieejpes.133.694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propagation of Lightning Current Studied by Remanent Magnetization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In theory, there may be differences in redox states of minerals affected by electric currents and impact shocks, however, the studies of this issue demonstrate that both may lead to reduction (Roberts et al (2019a)) and in general the results are rather inconclusive. The same situation is with magnetization of minerals by impacts and electric currents: it seems that both can lead to magnetization (Sakai et al (2013); Begnini et al (2013); Wasilewski (1973)), as well as demagnetization (Gattacceca et al (2010); Tikoo et al (2015)) -mostly due to intense heat -so the difference between the two is rather hard to pinpoint. The only obvious case where the magnetization could not have been caused by an impact and is most likely produced by electric currents is the sinuous rilles discussed in section 1.2.…”
Section: Mineralogical Evidencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…In theory, there may be differences in redox states of minerals affected by electric currents and impact shocks, however, the studies of this issue demonstrate that both may lead to reduction (Roberts et al (2019a)) and in general the results are rather inconclusive. The same situation is with magnetization of minerals by impacts and electric currents: it seems that both can lead to magnetization (Sakai et al (2013); Begnini et al (2013); Wasilewski (1973)), as well as demagnetization (Gattacceca et al (2010); Tikoo et al (2015)) -mostly due to intense heat -so the difference between the two is rather hard to pinpoint. The only obvious case where the magnetization could not have been caused by an impact and is most likely produced by electric currents is the sinuous rilles discussed in section 1.2.…”
Section: Mineralogical Evidencementioning
confidence: 96%