2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-003-0437-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propagation of polarization in elastodynamics with residual stress and travel times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principal example of elastic media with GWP studied in [15] is isotropic elastodynamics with residual stress. Hansen and Uhlmann [16] establish similar results for isotropic elastodynamics with residual stress in the presence of caustics.…”
Section: Braam and Duistermaatsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The principal example of elastic media with GWP studied in [15] is isotropic elastodynamics with residual stress. Hansen and Uhlmann [16] establish similar results for isotropic elastodynamics with residual stress in the presence of caustics.…”
Section: Braam and Duistermaatsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In particular, they show that the travel time of the wave through the object is uniquely determined by the associated DN map. Uniqueness also holds for isotropic elastodynamics [12], [13], [14], and, up to the natural obstruction, for isotropic media with residual stress [15], [16]. Hansen and Uhlmann [16] use a microlocal analytic approach to the study of reflection of singularities to prove that the scattering relation at the surface is determined by the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map, which extends Rachele's result [15] to the case that caustics are present.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are other results concerning the determination of the residual stress by infinitely many boundary measurements, i.e. by the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map, we refer to Hansen and Uhlmann (2003), Rachele (2003), and Robertson (1977Robertson ( , 1988.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%