2021
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2021.1980216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propagation of radar rainfall uncertainties into urban pluvial flood modeling during the North American monsoon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Event-based rainfall data were particularly accessible during flood seasons, with temporal resolutions varying from 6 hours to 1 hour, depending on rainfall intensity. Hjelmstad et al (2021) assessed the effectiveness of three radar-derived quantitative precipitation estimates (QPEs), namely Stage IV, Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS), and gauge-corrected MRMS (GCMRM), along with the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) hydrologic-hydraulic model for modeling pluvial flooding incidents during the North American monsoon in Phoenix. Their study focused on a specific urban catchment spanning 2.38 km 2 , and for four distinct storm events, they conducted simulations using both the original QPEs and an ensemble of 100 QPEs that accounted for radar uncertainty by incorporating a statistical error model.…”
Section: The Global Study Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Event-based rainfall data were particularly accessible during flood seasons, with temporal resolutions varying from 6 hours to 1 hour, depending on rainfall intensity. Hjelmstad et al (2021) assessed the effectiveness of three radar-derived quantitative precipitation estimates (QPEs), namely Stage IV, Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS), and gauge-corrected MRMS (GCMRM), along with the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) hydrologic-hydraulic model for modeling pluvial flooding incidents during the North American monsoon in Phoenix. Their study focused on a specific urban catchment spanning 2.38 km 2 , and for four distinct storm events, they conducted simulations using both the original QPEs and an ensemble of 100 QPEs that accounted for radar uncertainty by incorporating a statistical error model.…”
Section: The Global Study Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Event-based rainfall data were particularly accessible Ghalandari A Compilation of Benchmark Pluvial Flood Datasets during flood seasons, with temporal resolutions varying from 6 hours to 1 hour, depending on rainfall intensity. Hjelmstad et al (2021) assessed the effectiveness of three radar-derived quantitative precipitation estimates (QPEs), namely Stage IV, Multi-Radar Multi-Sensor (MRMS), and gauge-corrected MRMS (GCMRM), along with the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) hydrologic-hydraulic model for modeling pluvial flooding incidents during the North American monsoon in Phoenix. Their study focused on a specific urban catchment spanning 2.38 km 2 , and for four distinct storm events, they conducted simulations using both the original QPEs and an ensemble of 100 QPEs that accounted for radar uncertainty by incorporating a statistical error model.…”
Section: The Global Study Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mapping flash flood hazards in arid regions from CubeSats can lead to an improved understanding of hydrological processes as well as support for water resources decisionmaking. For instance, the performance of two-dimensional floodplain models can be evaluated through comparisons to the flood-affected areas determined from CubeSat data for different storm events [52][53][54][55], as shown here. Compared with traditional validation approaches that rely on in situ measurements, the flooding extent offered by CubeSat remote sensing can build confidence in the spatial model performance and corroborate other types of observations obtained from affected citizens, news media reports or postflood surveys [26,[56][57][58].…”
Section: Potential Applications For Post-flood Analyses In Arid Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%