2023
DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propensity score matching analysis of laparoscopic surgery vs. open approach in 4 297 adult patients with acute appendicitis, acute cholecystitis or gastrointestinal tract perforation: a prospective multicentre study of nationwide outcomes

Abstract: Background and aims: Previous studies indicated that laparoscopic surgery could improve postoperative outcomes in acute appendicitis, acute cholecystitis, perforated gastroduodenal ulcer, or acute diverticulitis, but some reported opposite results or differences in the magnitude of improvement. A contemporary analysis using propensity score matching that compares outcomes is lacking. Methods: Over a 6-month period, 38 centres (5% of all public hospitals… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above RCTS are more uncommon than other approaches to emergency surgery outcome inquiry. Given RCT logistical and methodological constraints, most EGS research has occurred as retrospective matched and non-matched studies documenting improved outcomes using a MIS approach [ 52 , 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Minimally Invasive Surgery Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above RCTS are more uncommon than other approaches to emergency surgery outcome inquiry. Given RCT logistical and methodological constraints, most EGS research has occurred as retrospective matched and non-matched studies documenting improved outcomes using a MIS approach [ 52 , 55 , 56 ].…”
Section: Minimally Invasive Surgery Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of Lluis et al . 4 showed that the incidence of postoperative complications was different across different acute abdominal diseases. However, the author omitted disease classification data into the model construction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%