1987
DOI: 10.1136/jme.13.2.74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proper care for the dying: a critical public issue.

Abstract: Authors' abstractthey become debilitated and seek aid in the health care system. Providers of health care increasingly fear litigation from disgruntled patients and their families. Third party payers feel pressure from their constituents to stem the flow of resources to high-tech interventions which merely prolong dying. Having entered into new zones of human freedom, providers and users of health care must learn how to communicate about death, how best to care for the dying, how to use available legal support… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All data seem unreliable, but like equality in Orwell's Animal Farm, some data seem more unreliable than others. Having said that there seems at least anecdotal evidence to support the quotation from Crispell and Gomez (1987)' that "Eighty per cent of the health care dollar is consumed by 13 per cent of the population of which half the patients are over 65 and on Medicare. The single most expensive medical bill is for the last week of life of a patient terminally ill in an acute care hospital."…”
Section: Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data seem unreliable, but like equality in Orwell's Animal Farm, some data seem more unreliable than others. Having said that there seems at least anecdotal evidence to support the quotation from Crispell and Gomez (1987)' that "Eighty per cent of the health care dollar is consumed by 13 per cent of the population of which half the patients are over 65 and on Medicare. The single most expensive medical bill is for the last week of life of a patient terminally ill in an acute care hospital."…”
Section: Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there have been a number of studies conducted and articles written on issues concerning the withdrawal of life support (Bedell & Delbanco, 1984;Cohen, 1982;Crispell & Gomez, 1987;Emanuel, 1988;Finucane, Shumway, Powers & D'Alessandri, 1988;Haug, 1978;Johnson and Justin, 1988;Lo & Jonsen, 1980;Meisel et al, 1986;Pinkus, 1984;Ruark et al, 1988;Shmerling, Bedell, Lilienfeld, & Delbanco, 1988;Stephens, 1986;Wanzer et al, 1984;Wanzer et al, 1989;Younger et al, 1985;Zimmerman et al, 1986), including the seminal report prepared by the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, "Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment" (1983). Crispell and Gomez (1987) defined terminal illness as "a state of disease characterized by progressive, irreversible deterioration, with impairment of function and survival limited in time" (p. 74). The ability of the medical profession to prolong the dying process has created the current, confusing situation for all concerned: The patient, his or her family, and the medical care team itself.…”
Section: Time To Quit: Bioethical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%