2003
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/4.1.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proper multivariate conditional autoregressive models for spatial data analysis

Abstract: In the past decade conditional autoregressive modelling specifications have found considerable application for the analysis of spatial data. Nearly all of this work is done in the univariate case and employs an improper specification. Our contribution here is to move to multivariate conditional autoregressive models and to provide rich, flexible classes which yield proper distributions. Our approach is to introduce spatial autoregression parameters. We first clarify what classes can be developed from the famil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
376
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 389 publications
(378 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
376
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a multivariate CAR (MCAR) prior, and is similar to that proposed by Gelfand and Vounatsou (2003). Such models are typically specified in their conditional form; that is, as a series of distributions for f k conditional on the remaining random effects.…”
Section: A Spatial Model For the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a multivariate CAR (MCAR) prior, and is similar to that proposed by Gelfand and Vounatsou (2003). Such models are typically specified in their conditional form; that is, as a series of distributions for f k conditional on the remaining random effects.…”
Section: A Spatial Model For the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here r is a spatial dependence parameter, with r close to one corresponding to strong spatial dependence in the data and r D 0 corresponding to independence in space. We note that this formulation implies the same level of spatial dependence (same value of r) for each census year, but this simplification could be relaxed if needed (for details, see Gelfand and Vounatsou [2003] and the wider MCAR literature). Relaxing this assumption, however, increases model complexity unnecessarily, and we justify it for our data in the next section.…”
Section: A Spatial Model For the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the univariate case, if jaj < 1, B is positive definite (as long as K is), but we again typically take 0 < a < 1. Besides being a propriety parameter, a can be interpreted as a coefficient which measures spatial association for each spatial random process (Gelfand and Vounatsou, 2003). If a ¼ 0, the / i are independent across the strata.…”
Section: Multivariate Car Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, it does not appear sensible to incorporate spatial association into the q i , b 0i , and g i mixing distributions, but ignore the correlation among these three components in any given stratum. Fortunately the multivariate conditionally autoregressive (MCAR) distribution, introduced by Mardia (1988) and recently shown to be computationally feasible for hierarchical modeling by Gelfand and Vounatsou (2003) and , emerges as ideal for rectifying this problem. In Section 2 we review CAR distributions in both the univariate and multivariate cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple response variables are available as indicators of health status, and as a result, models for multivariate spatial lattice data are an indispensable tool for analyzing health disparity data. Recently, Greco and Trivisano (2009), Zhang et al (2009), Jin et al (2007), Sain and Cressie (2007), Jin et al (2005), Gelfand and Vounatsou (2003), Carlin and Banerjee (2003) and Kim et al (2001) explored multivariate spatial models for lattice data, adopting the Bayesian framework as the natural inferential approach. The only exception, Sain (2009) developed the maximum likelihood estimation procedure for a special case, the multivariate gaussian conditional autoregressive (CAR) model of Sain and Cressie (2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%