2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2204.00517
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properly Proximal von Neumann Algebras

Abstract: We introduce the notion of proper proximality for finite von Neumann algebras, which naturally extends the notion of proper proximality for groups. Apart from the group von Neumann algebras of properly proximal groups, we provide a number of additional examples, including examples in the settings of free products, crossed products, and compact quantum groups. Using this notion, we answer a question of Popa by showing that the group von Neumann algebra of a nonamenable inner amenable group cannot embed into a f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since any non-amenable property Gamma von Neumann algebra cannot embed into the free group factor L(F n ) (see [Oza04]), Popa asked in [Pop21] if it still true that the group von Neumann algebra of a non-amenable inner amenable group cannot embed into L(F n ). Recently, inspired by the notion of properly proximal groups [BIP21] (see also [IPR19]), Ding, Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, and Peterson developed in [DKP22] subtle boundary techniques to define a notion of proper proximality for tracial von Neumann algebras, and as a consequence, they answered Popa's question in a positive way. As a particular case of Theorem E, we give a new proof for Popa's question by using methods from Popa's deformation/rigidity theory.…”
Section: Drimbementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since any non-amenable property Gamma von Neumann algebra cannot embed into the free group factor L(F n ) (see [Oza04]), Popa asked in [Pop21] if it still true that the group von Neumann algebra of a non-amenable inner amenable group cannot embed into L(F n ). Recently, inspired by the notion of properly proximal groups [BIP21] (see also [IPR19]), Ding, Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, and Peterson developed in [DKP22] subtle boundary techniques to define a notion of proper proximality for tracial von Neumann algebras, and as a consequence, they answered Popa's question in a positive way. As a particular case of Theorem E, we give a new proof for Popa's question by using methods from Popa's deformation/rigidity theory.…”
Section: Drimbementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, we derive several orbit equivalence rigidity results for actions of product groups that belong to M. Finally, for groups Γ satisfying condition (ii), we show that all embeddings of group von Neumann algebras of non-amenable inner amenable groups into L(Γ) are 'rigid'. In particular, we provide an alternative solution to a question of Popa that was recently answered by Ding, Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, and Peterson [Properly Proximal von Neumann Algebras, Preprint (2022), arXiv:2204.00517].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of Haagerup property is firstly introduced for locally compact groups in [Ha79] and then extended to tracial von Neumann algebras in [Ch83]. Following [BF11], [OOT17] and [DKP22], a II 1 factor M has the Haagerup property if it admits a mixing M -bimodule which has almost central unit vectors. 2.7.…”
Section: Weakly Mixing Bimodules and Property (T)mentioning
confidence: 99%