1970
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(70)90058-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of 96, 98Rh from the 96, 98Ru(p, n) reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Efficiency values at the higher energies up to ∼3 MeV were deduced from the intensity balance along the transition sequences observed in the coincidence spectra with gate on the higher-lying transitions following de-excitations in the 38 Ar [38], 39 K [39], 93 Tc [40], and 96 Ru [9] nuclei. The 38 Ar and 39 K were produced as fission products in the reaction of 28 Si ion beam with the light nuclei present in the target, viz., the 27 Al frame of the target and 16 O in the oxide form. The 93 Tc and 96 Ru were produced in the 4-particle emission channels of the present fusion-evaporation reaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Efficiency values at the higher energies up to ∼3 MeV were deduced from the intensity balance along the transition sequences observed in the coincidence spectra with gate on the higher-lying transitions following de-excitations in the 38 Ar [38], 39 K [39], 93 Tc [40], and 96 Ru [9] nuclei. The 38 Ar and 39 K were produced as fission products in the reaction of 28 Si ion beam with the light nuclei present in the target, viz., the 27 Al frame of the target and 16 O in the oxide form. The 93 Tc and 96 Ru were produced in the 4-particle emission channels of the present fusion-evaporation reaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-spin excited states in 98 Rh have been previously investigated from the β + and EC decay of 98 Pd (T 1/2 = 17.7 min) [26,27], and the in-beam light-ion-induced 98 Ru(p,nγ ) [28], 99 Ru(d,3n), and 96 Ru(α,np) [29] reactions. Concurrent γ -ray spectroscopic studies by Ghugre et al [30] and Chattopadhyay et al [31] using the heavy-ion-induced 65 Cu( 36 S,3n) and 70 Ge( 32 S,3pn) reactions have resulted in level scheme of 98 Rh up to high spins ∼20 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ME(96Rh) value of -79,630+_13 keV [24] was calculated assuming that the ground state of 96Rh was populated in the (p, n) reaction. Having improved knowledge on the decay schemes of 96g'mRh [15,16] one can find that the reported thresholds of 7.300 and 7.425 MeV [25] correspond to (p, n) reactions leading to the 52 keV isomeric state and the excited state at 177 keV, respectively. Taking the latter results into account, the mass-excess of 96gRh was recalculated to be -79,682+ 13 keV.…”
Section: %M1/58%e2mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Based on this result, Wapstra and Audi gave the mass-excess (ME) of -86,071___8 keV for 96Ru [24]. This, together with the determination of the 96Ru(p, n)96Rh reaction threshold of 7,300_+10 keV [25], leads to the mass-excess of 96Rh. However, the ME(96Rh) value of -79,630+_13 keV [24] was calculated assuming that the ground state of 96Rh was populated in the (p, n) reaction.…”
Section: %M1/58%e2mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This, in turn, did not allow an unambiguous spin-parity assignment for the ground state of Rh [1,2]. The P end-point energy was also determined in the above study, which, however, differs considerably, as much as 600 keV, from the value of 5057(10) keV obtained earlier from a 9sRu(p, n) reaction study [3]. The atomic mass table of Wapstra and Audi [4] has reported the latter value, which also agrees with the predictions of other mass tables [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%